Jun 21, 2022 City Council Meeting

MOVING RIGHT ALONG. HERE WE ARE, DOWN TO OUR COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

ALL RIGHTY.

MAYOR, I BELIEVE WE HAD TWO APPOINTMENTS, DIDN'T WE? DIDN'T YOU HAVE ONE ALSO? THERE IS A SECOND ONE FOR CARA HOUSE.

BUT DUE TO NOT BEING HERE RIGHT NOW.

KAREN, NOT YOU. I'M SORRY.

I APOLOGIZE. NO PROBLEM AT ALL.

SO WE WILL KICK THAT TO A FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA.

THAT BRINGS US TO OUR AGENDA ITEM SEVEN, WHICH IS OUR LIQUOR LICENSE, PUBLIC HEARINGS.

[7. LIQUOR LICENSE PUBLIC HEARINGS]

I'M GOING TO TAKE BOTH OF THESE TOGETHER.

THIS IS THE CONSIDERATION AND ACTION ON LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS FOR DARK SKY BREWING COMPANY AS WELL AS TEATRO ITALIAN KITCHEN.

WITH THAT, I'D LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IF STAFF HAS ANY COMMENTS, PLEASE JUMP IN HERE.

COUNCIL MAYOR I'M SERGEANT SAPP WITH THE FLAGSTAFF POLICE DEPARTMENT.

I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT THE APPLICATIONS.

AND I FOUND NO DEROGATORY REMARKS.

EXCELLENT. AND DO WE HAVE ANY APPLICANTS REQUEST TO SPEAK? ANY COUNCIL QUESTIONS? ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? NO, MAYOR. WE HAVE NO PUBLIC COMMENT ON THESE.

THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

MR. MAYOR. SORRY, IT LOOKS LIKE.

OH, SORRY, COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS.

I WAS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY.

THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, I HAVE A QUESTION TO MR. KEVIN HEINONEN.

FIRST ALLOW ME TO CREATE A SPACE OF GRATITUDE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF YOUR EFFORTS AND REVIVING THAT SPACE

[00:15:08]

ON NORTH SAN FRANCISCO.

SO TEATRO ITALIAN KITCHEN.

WHEN DO WE SEE WHEN WHEN DO WE HEAR ABOUT THE GRAND OPENING? I WOULD SAY AS SOON AS I CAN.

GET IT BUILT OUT IN THIS. NOW WE'RE HOPING THAT THAT WILL HAPPEN LATE THIS SUMMER.

I'M HOPING THAT'LL HAPPEN LATE THIS SUMMER.

WE'VE HAD A FEW SETBACKS IN CONSTRUCTION, AS YOU CAN IMAGINE.

ONE, IT'S A 100 YEAR OLD BUILDING, TOO.

WE'VE GOT A LOT OF CHALLENGES IN FINDING SUPPLIES, BUT OUR GOAL WILL BE SOMETIME BEFORE THE END OF AUGUST WOULD BE OUR HOPE.

THE CONTRACTOR HAS INDICATED HE SHOULD BE TURNING THAT OVER TO US SOMEWHERE AROUND EARLY TO MID-JULY.

I HAVE AN UPDATE ON THAT TOMORROW.

BUT SURELY IN THIS CALENDAR YEAR, IS THAT BROAD ENOUGH FOR YOU? I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO IT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

AND ALSO, DO WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM DARK SKY? DO YOU HAVE LARAMIE? HI, LARAMIE.

CAN. I WANT TO CREATE A BRIEF SPACE FOR GRATITUDE FOR BEING ONE OF THE EIGHT MAGNIFICENT FLAGSTAFF BREWERS.

SO YOUR APPLICATION IS FOR STORAGE WAREHOUSE ON SOUTH PLAZA WAY.

WILL YOU ALSO BE ABLE TO TO PROVIDE A TAPROOM OR TASTING IN THAT FACILITY, OR IS IT SPECIFICALLY FOR WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE ONLY? IT IS JUST FOR A PRODUCTION BREWERY.

NO TAPROOM. THANK YOU.

WITH THAT MAYOR.

WHEN IT'S APPROPRIATE, I'M READY TO MAKE A MOTION.

THANK YOU. WELL, I WILL JUST MENTION TO MR. HEINONEN THAT WE HAVE THIS REALLY GIANT PAIR OF COOL SCISSORS.

SO IF YOU'RE EVER NEEDING A REQUEST FROM COUNCIL TO TO USE THOSE SCISSORS, WE'RE HAPPY TO BE THERE.

THANK YOU. AND COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS.

LET'S GO AHEAD. ACTUALLY, MARY, JUST CLOSING THE HEARING RIGHT NOW AND THEN NOW COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS.

I MOVE TO FORWARD BOTH APPLICATIONS TO THE STATE LIQUOR BOARD WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.

I SECOND THAT MOTION.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

ALL RIGHT. WE ARE DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, OUR CONSENT ITEMS.

[8. CONSENT ITEMS All matters under Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendations listed on the agenda. Unless otherwise indicated, expenditures approved by Council are budgeted items.]

AND WE HAVE TWO OF THEM.

JUST TO LAY THEM OUT. CONSIDERATION APPROVAL OF A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT AND A AN APPROVAL OF THE EXECUTIVE RECRUITING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES, HR CONSULTING AND DUFFY GROUP.

I'D LIKE TO TAKE BOTH THESE CONSENT ITEMS TOGETHER AND MOVE TO A APPROVE.

SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY, WE ARE DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER NINE.

[A. Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-09: An ordinance amending Flagstaff City Code, Chapter 1-18, Administrative Departments, to establish the Sustainability Division and the City Clerk Divisions in City Code, and to retitle the City Engineering and Human/Resources/Risk Management Divisions. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-09 by title only for the final time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-09 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-09]

A OF ROUTINE ITEMS. THIS IS A CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-09, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE CHAPTER ONE THROUGH 18 OR 1-18 ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS TO ESTABLISH THE SUSTAINABILITY DIVISION AND THE CITY CLERK DIVISION IN CITY CODE AND TO RETITLE THE CITY ENGINEERING AND HUMAN RESOURCES RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION.

CITY STAFF OR JEANNIE ONLINE.

GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR.

VICE MAYOR, COUNCIL JEANNIE GALLAGHER.

AND THIS IS OUR SECOND READ FOR THIS ORDINANCE.

I'M AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU MUCH. WHEN I MOVED TO READ ORDINANCE SUMMER 2022-09 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FINAL TIME.

I'LL SECOND. SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

CITY CLERK? AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE CHAPTER 118 ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS TO ESTABLISH THE SUSTAINABILITY DIVISION AND THE CITY CLERK DIVISION, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY AUTHORITY FOR CLERICAL CORRECTIONS AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-09.

SECOND. SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

[B. Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-14: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Chapter 1-14, Personnel System by amending the Employee Handbook of Regulations relating to voluntary reassignment and transfer. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-14 by title only for the final time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-14 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-14]

AGENDA ITEM 9B OF ROUTINE ITEMS. CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-14.

[00:20:01]

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA, OMITTING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE CHAPTER 1-14 PERSONNEL SYSTEM BY AMENDING THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK OF REGULATIONS RELATING TO VOLUNTARY REASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL BRANDI SUDA, YOUR FORMER INTERIM HR DIRECTOR AND CURRENT FINANCE DIRECTOR.

I'M HERE FOR THE SECOND READING AN ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

I MOVE TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-14 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FINAL TIME.

I'LL SECOND. SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

CITY CLERK? AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE CHAPTER 1-14 PERSONNEL SYSTEM BY AMENDING THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK OF REGULATIONS RELATING TO VOLUNTARY REASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY AUTHORITY FOR CLERICAL CORRECTIONS, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

I MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-14.

SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

ALL RIGHT. ANNY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

AND SORRY I FORGOT TO MENTION IN THE FIRST ROUTINE ITEM, BUT CONGRATULATIONS CITY CLERK FOR COMING IN.

NEW DIVISION. ALL RIGHT.

AGENDA ITEM 9C.

[C. Consideration and Approval of Contract: FY 2022-23 Insurance Program Renewal STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the renewal premiums submitted by the Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool (AMRRP) for General Liability, E&O, SAM, Property, Auto, Marine, Crime, Cyber, Excess, and Worker’s Compensation coverage; Chubb Limited for Airport Liability; Aon Risk Insurance Services West for International Travel; and Industrial Commission of Arizona to fund the Firefighters Presumptive Cancer Claims.]

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 INSURANCE PROGRAM RENEWAL STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION IS TO ACCEPT THE RENEWAL PREMIUMS SUBMITTED BY THE ARIZONA MUNICIPAL RISK RETENTION POOL.

RP. FOR GENERAL LIABILITY.

E&O SAM PROPERTY, AUTO, MARINE CRIME, CYBER EXCESS AND WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE.

CHUBB LIMITED FOR AIRPORT LIABILITY AND RISK INSURANCE SERVICES.

WEST FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL AND INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA TO FUND THE FIREFIGHTERS PRESUMPTIVE CANCER CLAIMS. ALL RIGHT. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS MARIA ROBINSON, THE RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR, HERE, TO JUST PROVIDE A VERY QUICK OVERVIEW, SHORT PRESENTATION, AND THEN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ON IT.

ALL RIGHT. SO FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE BEEN AROUND, YOU MIGHT RECALL THAT THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF MOVED FROM BEING SELF-INSURED TO A POOL APPROACH BACK IN FISCAL YEAR 2021.

SO THIS WILL BE THE THIRD SORT OF RENEWAL, IF YOU WILL, OR THE THE THIRD, YEAH, RENEWAL.

THE POOL IS COMPRISED OF 77 MEMBERS AND A LOT OF THESE ARE SMALLER ENTITIES.

SO THIS PROVIDES A SMOOTHING EFFECT FOR THE MEMBERSHIP FEES, WHICH YOU CAN CONSIDER PREMIUMS, BUT THEY'RE CALLED MEMBERSHIP FEES IN OUR IN OUR AGREEMENT.

AND THOSE FEES ARE BASED PRIMARILY ON LOSS RUN, BUT THAT IS COMPRISED OF EXPOSURE, CONCENTRATION OF RISKS.

THE NCCI CODE FOR CLASSIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES PER POPULATION GROUP, FOR EXAMPLE, FIREFIGHTERS, POLICE OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, ET CETERA.

SO THAT'S HOW THAT THOSE MEMBERSHIP FEES ARE ARE DERIVED.

THERE ARE A NUMBER OF BENEFITS.

THEY ACTUALLY HAVE ABOUT 30 SERVICES THAT THEY PROVIDE TO US.

SO SORT OF AN EXTENSION, IF YOU WILL, OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT TEAM.

AND THESE ARE THE ONES THAT WE USE THE MOST OFTEN.

SO I WASN'T GOING TO LIST ALL 30, BUT BUT ONE OF THOSE THAT YOU'LL SEE UP THERE IS ONE OF THE BENEFITS IS AN ANNUAL DIVIDEND.

SO BASED ON OUR MEMBERSHIP FEES AT THE END OF THE YEAR, FORMULA BASED, THEY TAKE A LOOK AT OUR LOSS HISTORY AND AND EVERYONE ELSE'S.

AND THEN IF THEY'RE PRETTY STANDARD OF AN INSURANCE COMPANY, IF WE HAVE OVERPAID INTO THE INTO THE POOL, THEN THEY COME UP WITH A DIVIDEND THAT COMES BACK TO US.

AND THIS YEAR IN APRIL, THAT DIVIDEND WAS ALMOST 250,000.

SO WE HAD AN OUTSTANDING, OUTSTANDING YEAR HOPE TO CONTINUE THAT.

WE ELECTED TO TAKE THAT AS A CREDIT TOWARDS THOSE MEMBERSHIP FEES, WHICH WILL BE EFFECTIVE IN JULY.

BUT HERE'S WHAT YOU'RE REALLY INTERESTED IN.

I'M SURE AS OUR LIABILITY PACKAGE IS JUST A LITTLE BIT OVER $1,000,000, THIS WAS AN INCREASE OF 5% FROM THE PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR DUE TO RATE INCREASES AND EXPOSURE CHANGES, BUT LISTED WHAT IT COVERS.

AND THEN OF COURSE, BASED ON THE TYPE OF COVERAGE LINE, THE DEDUCTIBLES AND THE PREMIUMS VARY, THE EXCESS COVERAGE.

AND I JUST PUT AN EXAMPLE, THERE IS LIKE NO FAULT SEWER BACKUP, OUR SEXUAL ABUSE AND MOLESTATION.

THERE'S A NUMBER OF EXCESS COVERAGES THAT WE CARRY THAT CAME TO A LITTLE OVER 130,000.

THAT'S ACTUALLY A DECREASE OF 11% BECAUSE THAT'S BASED ON BUDGET.

AND A LOT OF THAT IS PAYROLL.

AND THEN OUR WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND THIS IS AN ESTIMATE BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON PAYROLL AND THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IN THOSE SPECIFIC CLASSIFICATION CODES, JUST UNDER 800,000 FOR A TOTAL OF $1.9226062 THERE.

[00:25:04]

WE ALSO HAVE TWO LINES OF COVERAGE NOT WITH AARP.

SO THESE ARE WITH CHUBB AND AON.

AARP DOES NOT COVER THAT LINE OF COVERAGE.

THEY'RE WORKING ON THAT, STARTING TO DABBLE IN THAT.

SO THOSE ARE FLOATED OUT TO A DIFFERENT CARRIER.

AVIATION IS AIRPORT SPECIFIC COVERAGE, SO A LITTLE OVER 15,000 FOR THAT.

AND THEN THE FOREIGN LIABILITY IS WHAT COVERS OUR EMPLOYEES THAT HAVE TO TRAVEL INTERNATIONALLY.

AND SO EVERY YEAR WE HAVE A HANDFUL OF VERY SMALL HANDFUL THAT TRAVEL ABROAD AND THAT INSURANCE LINE COVERS THEM.

AND THEN THERE'S A DEFERRED ACQUISITION COST OF 500.

SO THAT'S A TOTAL OF A LITTLE OVER 18,000.

NOW IN YOUR PACKET, YOU WILL HAVE SEEN THAT I ESTIMATED THAT TOTAL AT I THINK IT WAS FOR A LITTLE OVER 48,000.

THAT WAS AN ESTIMATE OF A THREE YEAR POLICY.

IT TOOK IT TOOK LONGER TO GET THESE QUOTES BACK FROM THE INSURANCE CARRIER THAN IT DID AARP.

SO I DIDN'T HAVE THAT NUMBER I HAD BASED IT ON A 17% INCREASE.

BECAUSE I KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON IN OTHER INDUSTRIES ACROSS THE BOARD AND WHERE THOSE INCREASES WERE COMING.

JUST GENERALLY SPEAKING, WHEN WE GOT THE QUOTE BACK, THE THREE YEAR POLICY WAS A LITTLE OVER 54,000.

IT WAS A 32% INCREASE.

15% OF THAT INCREASE IS COMMISSION FEES.

SO WE ELECTED I TALKED WITH DIETRICH SAUER, WHO WAS ON VIRTUALLY.

WE DISCUSSED IT AND WE DECIDED THAT WE WOULD GO WITH THE ONE YEAR RENEWAL ON THAT, GIVING US TIME TO SHOP THAT FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR.

SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE CHOSE.

THEN NEW THIS YEAR, WE HAVE THE FIREFIGHTER CANCER REIMBURSEMENT FUND THAT IS MANAGED BY THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA THAT IS STRICTLY BASED ON MUNICIPAL POPULATION.

SO INSIDE THE CITY LINE.

SO I CIRCLED IT THERE.

YOU'LL SEE THEY HAVE THE POPULATION A LITTLE OVER 75,000.

I KNOW THAT IN THE NEW CENSUS COUNT, IT'S ABOUT 77,000, JUST UNDER 78,000.

SO I ANTICIPATE THIS NUMBER GOING UP FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR WHENEVER THEY RECALCULATE.

BUT THIS YEAR'S FEE WAS JUST UNDER 200,000.

SO OVERALL, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION, WE NEED INSURANCE, WE NEED COVER.

IT IS TO APPROVE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF A LITTLE OVER 2 MILLION, $2,144,901, WHICH AGAIN IS LESS THAN WHAT I SUBMITTED BECAUSE OF THE AVIATION PIECE.

QUESTIONS. UH, ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION AND FOR THE ADDITIONAL QUARTER MILLION BACK.

I MOVED TO ACCEPT THE RENEWAL PREMIUM SUBMITTED BY THE ARIZONA MUNICIPAL RISK RETENTION POOL FOR GENERAL LIABILITY AND SO FORTH.

THE REST OF WHAT I SAID BEFORE.

SECOND.

SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ANY OPPOS3ED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU ALL. NOW WE ARE DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM TEN, WHICH IS OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR

[10. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS]

2022-2023, BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAX LEVY.

WITH THAT, I AM OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR AND COUNCIL BRANDI SUDA, THE CITY'S FINANCE DIRECTOR.

SO MY PRESENTATION TONIGHT WILL COVER 10A.

SO HERE'S THE TIMELINE FOR THE CITY'S BUDGET ADOPTION.

SO TWO WEEKS AGO, ON JUNE 7TH, WE HAD THE TENTATIVE BUDGET ADOPTION.

TONIGHT, WE FIRST HAVE THE CITY'S PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO THE BUDGET AND THE TAX LEVY, FOLLOWED BY THE FINAL BUDGET ADOPTION, BE IT OR BE A RESOLUTION.

AND THEN THE FIRST READ OF THE PROPERTY TAX ORDINANCE THAT SETS THE PROPERTY TAX RATE.

THEN IN TWO WEEKS, ON JULY 5TH, WE WILL HAVE THE SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ORDINANCE OR YES, ORDINANCE.

SO THE CITY'S TOTAL FISCAL YEAR 2022 2023 BUDGET IS $540,887,795. THIS IS A $152 MILLION INCREASE OR A 39% INCREASE OVER THE PRIOR YEAR'S BUDGET.

[00:30:03]

AGAIN, MUCH OF THIS INCREASE IS RELATED TO CAPITAL PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE VARIOUS FUNDS OF THE CITY, AS WELL AS AN INCREASE IN GRANTS BUDGETED.

THE CITY'S BUDGET IS BROKEN DOWN INTO FIVE FUND TYPES GENERAL FUND, SPECIAL REVENUE FUND, DEBT SERVICE, CAPITAL PROJECTS AND ENTERPRISE FUNDS.

THE GENERAL FUND PORTION OF THE BUDGET IS APPROXIMATELY $121.5 MILLION, OR 23% OF THE BUDGET.

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS MAKE UP $152,000,152.8 MILLION, OR 23% OF THE BUDGET.

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS INCLUDE FUNDS SUCH AS HER FOR THE HIGHWAY USER REVENUE FUND, TRANSPORTATION TAX PARK FLAG AND OUR BBB FUNDS OR OUR BED BOARD AND BEVERAGE FUNDS.

OUR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS MAKE UP $17.5 MILLION OR 3% OF THE BUDGET.

THESE FUNDS INCLUDE OUR GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND DEBT SERVICE AS WELL AS OUR PENSION BOND FUNDS.

NEXT, WE HAVE OUR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS FOR BOTH OUR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND OUR NON BOND FUNDED PROJECTS MAKING UP $49.1 MILLION OR 9% OF THE BUDGET.

AND LASTLY, WE HAVE OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS THAT INCLUDE DRINKING WATER, WASTEWATER RECLAIMED WATER, STORM WATER SOLID WASTE, SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, FLAGSTAFF HOUSING AUTHORITY AND AIRPORT, WHICH MAKES UP 100.

$199.9 MILLION OR 37% OF THE BUDGET.

INCLUDED IN THE CITY'S BUDGET IS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES.

SO BASED ON COUNCIL DIRECTION THIS SPRING FOR A FLAT LEVY FOR THE CITY'S PRIMARY PROPERTY TAX, THE TOTAL PROPOSED CITY PRIMARY PROPERTY TAX IS JUST OVER $7.1 MILLION.

THIS LEVY DOES INCLUDE NEW CONSTRUCTION REVENUES OF $90,600 AND IS BASED ON AN AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE ON EXISTING PROPERTY WITH AN INCREASE OF 3.4%.

BASED ON THE ASSESSED VALUE AND THE FLAT LEVY.

THE PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATE IS 0.6954 PER $100 OF ASSESSED VALUE, WHICH IS A RATE DECREASE OVER THE PRIOR YEAR'S RATE OF 0.7186.

THIS LEVY IS ALSO $435,892 BELOW THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED LEVY PER STATE STATUTE.

AND THE CITY'S PRIMARY PROPERTY TAXES ARE UNRESTRICTED.

REVENUES ARE INCLUDED IN THE CITY'S GENERAL FUND BUDGET.

THE SECOND PROPOSAL IS ON OUR SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY, WHICH IS BASED ON A FLAT RATE AT APPROXIMATELY $8.1 MILLION.

THIS IS AT A RATE OF 0.8000 PER $100 OF ASSESSED VALUE.

AND THIS IS A 4.7% INCREASE IN THE TAX LEVY PER STATE STATUTE.

THIS LEVY CANNOT EXCEED OUR ESTIMATED GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR.

SO THIS SLIDE PROVIDES A FIVE YEAR HISTORY OF THE CITY'S PROPERTY TAX RATES.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE CITY'S OVERALL PROPERTY TAX RATES HAVE DECREASED YEAR OVER YEAR FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS.

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 223, THE MAXIMUM RATE ALLOWED WOULD HAVE BEEN 0.7379 PER $100 OF ASSESSED VALUE.

AND THE CITY'S PROPOSED RATE, WHICH IS EQUAL TO THE FLAT LEVY RATE IS 0.6954.

THE CITY'S PROPERTY ASSESSED, VALUATIONS INCREASED OVER THE PRIOR YEAR.

THE CITY'S LIMITED NET ASSESSED VALUATION INCREASED $4.7 MILLION OR 4.7%, WHICH DOES INCLUDE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF $13 MILLION.

AND THE FULL CASH VALUE INCREASED 3.5%.

THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE IS THE ONE THAT DETERMINES THESE VALUES.

AND THESE VALUES ARE BASED ON VALUATIONS DONE IN LATE 2000 OR 2020.

FOR THE TAX YEAR 2022.

PER STATE STATUTES, LIMITED ASSESSED VALUE IS BASED IS USED FOR THE CALCULATION FOR BOTH OUR PRIMARY AND OUR SECONDARY PROPERTY TAXES AS WELL AS LIMITED ASSESSED VALUE IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF A 5% INCREASE PER YEAR FOR MOST REAL PROPERTY.

SO HOW DOES THE CITY'S PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATES IMPACT OUR COMMUNITY'S PROPERTY TAXES? SO, FOR EXAMPLE, FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WITH ASSESSED VALUE OF $100,000, ASSUMING NO INCREASE IN ASSESSED VALUATION FROM

[00:35:08]

THE PRIOR YEAR, THEY WOULD SEE AN OVERALL SMALL DECREASE OF $2.32.

FOR A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITH AN ASSESSED VALUE OF $1,000,000.

AGAIN, ASSUMING NO INCREASE IN THE ASSESSED VALUATION OVER THE PRIOR YEAR, THEY WOULD SEE AN OVERALL DECREASE OF $116 IN $0.53. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

YOU MUST SIT UP. COUNCIL, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? I HAVE A QUESTION. COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS? THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION.

CAN YOU REWIND TO SLIDE ONE? THE PIE CHART.

JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE LISTENING PUBLIC, IT SAYS.

152.1 MILLION AND 39% INCREASE OVER FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022.

COULD YOU PROVIDE A BRIEF EXPLANATION ON WHY IS THAT INCREASE, WHY WE HAVE A 39% INCREASE FROM LAST YEAR? ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION.

SO A GOOD CHUNK OF THAT IS RELATED TO CAPITAL PROJECTS.

SO THERE WERE SEVERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN STARTED AS PART OF THE 21-22.

THOSE GOT CARRIED OVER DUE TO TIMING AS WELL AS NEW PROJECTS RELATED IN THE TRANSPORTATION FUND AND OUR WATER SERVICES FUNDS STORM WATER.

THERE WERE NUMEROUS PROJECTS THAT GOT ADDED TO OUR BUDGET IN THE UPCOMING YEAR DUE TO SOME OF OUR NEEDS RELATED TO CITY INFRASTRUCTURE AS WELL AS OUR AGGRESSIVE GOALS TO GET AS MANY GRANTS.

SO WE DID INCREASE OUR GRANT BUDGET FOR THIS UPCOMING YEAR IN THE HOPES THAT WE WILL RECEIVE THAT GRANT FUNDING AND CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH THOSE PROJECTS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION.

AND WE'RE GOING TO GET THOSE GRANTS.

YOU'RE LISTENING, STACEY.

BC YEAH, WE'RE GOING TO GET THEM.

YES, WE ARE.

I'M LISTENING.

I'M WITH YOU, MAYOR.

ALL RIGHT. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC PARTICIPANTS? NO, MAYOR, WE DO NOT.

ALL RIGHT. WELL, WITH THAT, WE CAN CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND CONVENE THE SPECIAL MEETING.

DO I NEED A VOTE FOR DOING THIS SPECIAL MEETING? JUST TRYING TO CHECK ON PROCEDURE.

JUST MOVE RIGHT ALONG. YEP.

SOUNDS GOOD. THEN WE'RE DOWN TO AGENDA.

[11. SPECIAL MEETING]

ITEM 11, OUR SPECIAL MEETING, CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-31.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023.

AND YEAH, THAT WAS ALL THE FULL PRESENTATION.

THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROPOSED BASICALLY HALF MIL THAT COUNCIL WAS DISCUSSING FOR BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, EARLY CHILDHOOD ED THAT I WOULD LIKE TO BRING BACK.

DO YOU HAVE THAT SLIDE AVAILABLE BY CHANCE? NO, THIS IS A? WE CAN WORK ON IT, BUT WE DON'T HAVE IT AT THIS TIME.

BUT OVERALL, THAT WILL NOT IMPACT THE TOTAL BUDGET ADOPTION WILL BRING BACK A PROPOSAL THAT.

OKAY, SO THAT WILL BE DISCUSSED AT A FUTURE TIME, CORRECT.

NOT THIS LIST HERE. MAYOR.

VICE MAYOR. CITY COUNCIL RICK TADDER MANAGEMENT SERVICE DIRECTOR.

WE DO HAVE A LIST FROM LAST PRESENTATION THAT WE DID IN TWO WEEKS AGO FOR THE TENTATIVE ADOPTION.

WE COULD TRY AND FIND IT AND PULL IT UP IF YOU NEED TO.

BUT I'M JUST WONDERING, WHAT KIND OF QUESTIONS DO YOU HAVE ABOUT THOSE LISTS? WHAT'S ON THERE? ALL THOSE HAVE BEEN FUNDED, BUT WE STILL HAVE TO GO TO PROCUREMENT PROCESSES TO COMPLETE THOSE TYPES OF CONSIDERATIONS ALSO.

CERTAINLY. WELL, THERE WERE SOME LEGAL CONCERNS PREVIOUSLY ABOUT ONE OF THE ITEMIZED.

YEAH. LINE ITEMS AND I WANTED TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT WITH COUNCIL OR SEE IF WE NEEDED TO REALLOCATE THINGS AND IF THIS IS THE APPROPRIATE TIME OR HOW IS THE BEST WAY TO APPROACH IT FROM THE FINANCIAL BUREAUCRATS PERSPECTIVE, AS FAR AS APPROVING A BUDGET, WE CAN APPROVE IT A BUDGET AND LEAVE IT IN, BUT THEN WE CAN GO THROUGH THE LEGAL PROCESS AND DETERMINE IF WE CAN PROVIDE FUNDING OR NOT THROUGH THAT PROCESS. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO ADJUST TO CURRENT BUDGET IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING TO DO.

[00:40:05]

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT APPROVING AND MOVING FORWARD SOMETHING THAT WE MIGHT HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE.

SO I'M WANTED TO TOUCH BASE REGARDING THAT ISSUE IN PARTICULAR ABOUT THAT LINE ITEM.

COUNCIL MEMBER ASLAN. YEAH, I'M NOT SURE.

LET ME KNOW IF THIS ISN'T WHAT YOU MEAN, BUT JUST ANOTHER WAY TO PHRASE IT.

I THINK MAYBE THIS IS WHAT I WANT AND I THINK MAYBE WHAT THE MAYOR'S ASKING FOR TOO.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WHATEVER WE DO TODAY DOESN'T.

UM. NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE CHOICES AVAILABLE TO US FOR THAT CONVERSATION.

SO IF WE'RE STILL ABLE TO HAVE THE FULL THE SAME CONVERSATION WE WOULD IF WE PASS THE BUDGET TODAY, THEN IS IS THAT KIND OF WHAT YOU'RE ASKING? EXACTLY. THANK YOU.

SO MY QUESTION, TOO.

YEAH, THERE WAS AN ITEM AT THE APRIL RETREAT FOR 37,500.

I'M NOT SURE IF THAT'S THE ONE YOU'RE DISCUSSING.

YEAH. THAT'S, THAT'S IN THE BUDGET.

BUT WE DO HAVE LEGAL WILL BE BRINGING A CONVERSATION BACK TO COUNCIL THAT WILL BE A FUTURE EXECUTIVE SESSION BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT.

SO THAT WOULD BE JUST REVIEWING THAT DOESN'T HAVE AN IMPACT ON OUR FINAL BUDGETARY 30,000 FOOT APPROVAL THAT WE'RE DOING RIGHT NOW. AND THEN IF WE DON'T SPEND THAT, WE COULD REALLOCATE IT, BUT WE WILL NOT SPEND A DOLLAR OF THAT UNTIL THAT LEGAL CONVERSATION.

OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THEN I DID WANT TO BRING UP ON THAT NOTE, SINCE THAT WON'T BE AS MUCH OF A DISCUSSION TODAY, BUT WE HAVE ABOUT 18,000 RIGHT NOW IN OUR COUNCIL, DISCRETIONARY FUND COUNCIL THAT WE WOULD NEED TO BE ABLE TO EXPEND BEFORE JULY 1ST.

AND IF WE'D LIKE TO BRING THAT UP BEFORE THE JULY 1ST DEADLINE, WHICH WOULD BE BRINGING IT UP NEXT WEEK, WE CAN. OR WOULD IT BE A BETTER SUITING FOR US TO DISCUSS THAT $18,000 IN THAT FUND AT THIS TIME? BECAUSE THAT'S KIND OF CONNECTED TO SOME OF THOSE LINE ITEMS THAT WE COULD POTENTIALLY FUND AND POTENTIALLY FREE UP THAT HALF MILLION DOLLAR LIST THAT WE HAD PUT TOGETHER.

SO THE 18,000 IS JUST FOR THIS YEAR'S BUDGET.

IT DOESN'T AFFECT THIS BUDGET ADOPTION THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH AT THIS TIME.

AS FAR AS GIVEN DIRECTION, I'M NOT SURE IF WE WANT TO PUT THAT ON A WORK SESSION FOR NEXT WEEK.

I'M LOOKING AT STERLING FOR THAT.

IF YOU WANT COUNCIL TO CONSIDER USING THAT 18,000 THAT YOU HAVE LEFT OVER FOR SOME EXPENDITURES IN THIS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR.

CORRECT, BECAUSE IT HAS TO IT DOES HAVE TO BE SPENT BEFORE JULY 1ST.

AND THAT'S AN 18,000 POOL THAT WE COULD USE ON SOME OF THE PROJECTS COUNCIL IS INTERESTED IN.

SO LEGAL CLIFTON.

AND IF IT'S NOT SPENT, IT JUST GOES TO FUND BALANCE.

WE'LL REALLOCATE. SO CERTAINLY BUT YES.

CITY MANAGER? THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR THE DISCUSSION.

I RECALL THIS DISCUSSION A YEAR AGO THIS TIME AS WELL.

AND I'M TRYING TO RECALL IF THOSE MONIES RICK TADDER HAD TO BE EXPENDED ACTUALLY EXPENDED BY JULY 1ST OR JUST OBLIGATED.

AND I'M WONDERING IF YOU CAN PROVIDE SOME CLARITY ON THAT.

THE ANSWER IS OBLIGATED.

WE NEED A CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENT TO SPEND THOSE FUNDS.

RIGHT. AND WITH RESPECT TO THE QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THAT COULD THAT DIRECTION TO OBLIGATE MONEY TO SERVICES DELIVERED AND OBLIGATED.

CORRECT. THAT COULD BE ON THE WORK SESSION NEXT WEEK.

YES. THERE'S NO PROBLEM WITH THAT.

YES. OKAY. WELL, LET'S NOT TIE UP THE DISCUSSION OF THE 30,000 FEET WITH THE THINGS ON GROUND LEVEL FOR THOSE KINDS OF EXPENDITURE.

WE'LL MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.

BUT PLEASE AGENDA IS THAT FOR NEXT WEEK SO WE CAN ENSURE WE'RE HAVING A DISCUSSION ABOUT THOSE FUNDS BEFORE THEY ARE REVERTED BACK INTO THE GENERAL FUND.

SOUND GOOD? THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

WITH THAT, I'M WILLING TO MOVE TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022 TO 31 BY TITLE ONLY.

SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

FOR ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY A CITY CLERK, A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023. THANK YOU, ED.

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-31.

I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ALL RIGHT.

AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

WITH THAT, WE WILL RECONVENE OUR REGULAR MEETING.

[00:45:01]

WHICH BRINGS US TO AGENDA ITEM 12 OF OUR REGULAR AGENDA.

[A. Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-16: An ordinance levying upon the assessed valuation of the property within the City of Flagstaff, Arizona, subject to taxation a certain sum upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of valuation sufficient to raise the amount estimated to be required in the Annual Budget, less the amount estimated to be received from other sources of revenue; providing funds for various bond redemptions, for the purpose of paying interest upon bonded indebtedness and providing funds for general municipal expenses, all for the Fiscal Year ending the 30th day of June 2023. (Primary and secondary property tax levies for FY 2022-2023) STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: At the June 21, 2022 Council Meeting: 1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-16 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-16 by title only (if approved above) At the July 5, 2022 Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-16 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-16 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-16]

AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A CONTEST BETWEEN ME AND CITY CLERK ON THIS ONE.

WHO CAN WHO CAN SAY AT THE QUICKEST CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-16, AN ORDINANCE LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA, SUBJECT TO TAXATION, A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH $100, A VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, LESS THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE, PROVIDING FUNDS FOR VARIOUS BOND REDEMPTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING INTEREST UPON BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND PROVIDING FUNDS FOR GENERAL MUNICIPAL EXPENSES.

ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2023.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022 TO 2023.

AND WITH THAT I MOVE TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-16 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

CITY CLERK? ALL RIGHT. AN ORDINANCE LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA, SUBJECT TO TAXATION, A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH $100, A VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, LESS THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE, PROVIDING FUNDS FOR VARIOUS BOND REDEMPTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING INTEREST UPON BONDED INDEBTEDNESS, AND PROVIDING FUNDS FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2023.

THANK YOU, CITY CLERK.

AND I THINK I WON ON THAT ONE BECAUSE YOU TRIPPED UP ON INDEBTEDNESS, SO.

ALL RIGHT. EXCELLENT.

WELL, WE WILL KICK THAT AND DO A FINAL READ FOR JULY 5TH, CONSIDERING WE'RE DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM 12B, WHICH IS THE CONSIDERATION ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER

[B. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-33: A resolution approving Binding Waivers of Enforcement for four parcels of land located in the City of Flagstaff. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read Resolution No. 2022-33 by title only 2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-33 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-33]

2022-33, A RESOLUTION APPROVING BINDING WAIVERS OF ENFORCEMENT FOR FOUR PARCELS OF LAND LOCATED IN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

MS. RUBALCAVA. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL CHRISTINA RUBALCAVA, SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.

SO ON NOVEMBER 17TH OF 2020, THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2020-28, WHICH MADE VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE AND MADE CERTAIN CHANGES REGULATING WHAT WE CALL HIGH OCCUPANCY HOUSING, WHICH INCLUDES REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HIGH OCCUPANCY HOUSING, RESTRICTING OF FOUR UNITS OR MORE TO THE PED SHED OF AN ACTIVITY CENTER.

AND IT ADDED SOME PARKING, BEDROOM, BATHROOM AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS.

ALSO ON MARCH 1ST OF THIS YEAR, THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2022-04, WHICH MADE VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE, WHICH WE REFER TO AS THE RESIDENTIAL SUSTAINABLE BUILDING INCENTIVE.

AND THOSE AMENDMENTS INCLUDED REQUIRING ALL ELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL FROM THE SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR FOR WASTE REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLANS IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR THE INCENTIVE. DURING THE MONTH OF MAY 2022, THE CITY RECEIVED PROP 207 CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF FOUR PARCELS OF LAND.

TWO WERE ON THE HOH AMENDMENTS, AND TWO WERE ON THE RESIDENTIAL SUSTAINABLE BUILDING INCENTIVE AND THE OWNERS OF THOSE FOUR PROPERTIES CLAIMED THAT AS A RESULT OF THOSE TWO AMENDMENTS, THE PROPERTIES LOST A COLLECTIVE $9.8 MILLION.

ARS12-1134, WHICH IS ALSO KNOWN AS PROP 207, PROVIDES THAT IF THE EXISTING RIGHTS TO USE, DIVIDE, SELL OR POSSESS PRIVATE, REAL PROPERTY ARE REDUCED BY THE ENACTMENT OR APPLICABILITY OF ANY LAND USE LAW ENACTED AFTER THE DATE THE PROPERTY IS TRANSFERRED AND SUCH ACTION REDUCES THE FAIR MARKET VALUE THAN THE OWNER IS ENTITLED TO.

JUST COMPENSATION FROM THE MUNICIPALITY.

THE LAND OWNER MUST MAKE A WRITTEN DEMAND FOR A SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF JUST COMPENSATION, WHICH WAS DONE IN THIS CASE FOR THE FOUR PARCELS.

AND THEN THE CITY HAS 90 DAYS TO PAY.

AMEND THE LAND USE LAW, OR PERMANENTLY WAIVE ENFORCEMENT OF THE NEW LAND USE LAW AGAINST THE LANDOWNERS PARCEL.

AND IF THE CITY DOES NOT ACT, THEN THE LANDOWNER MAY FILE A CLAIM FOR JUST COMPENSATION IN SUPERIOR COURT WITHIN THREE YEARS FROM THE DATE THAT THE LAW TOOK EFFECT.

JUST COMPENSATION IS THE REDUCTION IN FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR THE PROPERTY RESULTING FROM THE LAND USE LAW AND FAIR MARKET VALUE IS THE MOST LIKELY PRICE OF THE LAND WOULD BRING IF EXPOSED FOR SALE ON THE OPEN MARKET.

SO IF APPROVED BY COUNCIL TONIGHT, THE CITY WILL AGREE AND DECLARE THAT THE ZONING CODE AMENDMENT FOR TWO PROPERTIES AND THEN THE RESIDENTIAL SUSTAINABLE BUILDING INCENTIVE FOR THE OTHER TWO PROPERTIES WILL NOT APPLY.

THE HOH WILL NOT APPLY IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND THEN THE RESIDENTIAL SUSTAINABLE BUILDING INCENTIVE WILL APPLY IN A MODIFIED FORM AS SET FORTH AND THAT BINDING WAIVER ENFORCEMENT WHICH IS ATTACHED AND TO THE STAFF SUMMARY.

SO WITH THAT, I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS, COUNCIL? ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT, I MOVE TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-33 BY TOTAL TITLE ONLY.

[00:50:06]

I'LL SECOND. SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

CITY CLERK? A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL APPROVING BINDING WAIVERS OF ENFORCEMENT FOR FOUR PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-33.

I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU. MOVING RIGHT ALONG HERE.

AGENDA ITEM 12C IS THE CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-32, A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AND THE

[C. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-32: A resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Flagstaff and the Northern Arizona Intergovernmental Public Transportation Authority (Mountain Line) for the Downtown Connection Center (DCC). STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read Resolution No. 2022-32 by title only 2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-32 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-32]

NORTHERN ARIZONA INTERGOVERNMENTAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MOUNTAIN LINE FOR THE DOWNTOWN CONNECTION CENTER.

MR. FOLKE, GOOD EVENING.

LET ME GET MY SLIDE PULLED UP HERE.

UH. YEAH, I HAD A PDF SAID IT LOOKS LIKE SOMEBODY CLOSED IT.

OKAY. LET ME FIND IT ON THE HERE.

HOLD. IT'S LOADING.

YEAH. VOILA.

WE LIKE PICTURES.

LET'S TRY THAT. ALL RIGHT.

GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.

MY NAME IS DAN FOLKE. I'M THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FOR THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

AND I'M HERE TODAY TO PRESENT A PROPOSED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MOUNTAIN LION.

NAME IS THE ACRONYM.

IT'S A LONG NAME, BUT WE LIKE TO CALL IT MOUNTAIN LION.

THIS IS VERY EXCITING. SO THIS IS FOR CONSTRUCTION TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THEIR NEW DOWNTOWN CONNECTION CENTER.

AND SO I HAVE A GRAPHIC PULLED UP.

UM. I WAS TRYING TO GET THAT JUST TO SHOW THE.

SITE PLAN.

I DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET RID OF ALL THAT SIDE STUFF, BUT.

ESSENTIALLY. LET ME JUST SHOW YOU A QUICK OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT AND WHAT THE IGA IS GOING TO BE ADDRESSING.

AND SO THIS IS THE LOCATION ON PHENIX AVENUE WHERE MOUNTAIN LION IS CURRENTLY OPERATING THERE, THEIR CURRENT CONNECTION CENTER OR DOWNTOWN TRANSIT CENTER.

AND SO THE PROPOSAL IS TO BUILD A NEW DOWNTOWN CONNECTION CENTER IN TWO PHASES.

THE FIRST PHASE IS LOCATED AT THE WEST END OF THE PROPERTY, SO RIGHT ON THE CORNER OF MILTON AND PHENIX, ACROSS FROM THE HUB.

AND SO THE FIRST PHASE IS CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BUILDING.

AND SO THIS IS A NEW BUILDING FOR THEIR NEW OFFICES, FOR CUSTOMERS TO COME IN, BE ABLE TO BUY TRANSIT PASSES, DO BUSINESS, ET CETERA.

AND SO THE FIRST PHASE REALLY DOESN'T IMPACT THE EXISTING BUS LAYOUT OR THE PARKING, WHICH IS ON THE SITE, WHICH IS PARK FLAGG PUBLIC PARKING.

THE SECOND PHASE, WHICH WILL HAPPEN AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROAD FLAG FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, THAT'S THE MAIN REASON WE'VE PHASED THIS OUT WILL INCLUDE RECONFIGURATION OF THE BUS BAYS, SO THEY'LL BE GAINING ADDITIONAL BUS BAYS.

IT ALSO INCLUDES SOME CIVIC SPACE CLOSER TO THE EAST END OF THE PROPERTY, AND IT RETAINS THAT EXISTING PARKING LOT THAT'S DOWN ON BEAVER AND PHENIX.

WE'VE BROKEN THE IGA INTO TWO LOCATIONS AS WELL.

SO ONE LOCATION IS WHAT WE'RE CALLING THE DCC FOOTPRINT.

AND SO THAT'S YOUR EXHIBIT A IN THE IGA, AND THIS IS THE AREA THAT MOUNTAIN LINE WILL ACTUALLY BE IMPROVING AS PART OF THEIR PROJECT IN TWO PHASES.

SO I'M KIND OF OUTLINING IT HERE WITH THIS HAND.

AND SO THAT'S THE AREA THAT AGAIN IS SUBJECT TO THE WHAT MOUNTAIN LINE WILL BE USING CITY PROPERTY FOR THE DCC.

AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER PIECE THAT WE'RE CALLING A RESERVED AREA, AND THAT'S SORT OF WHERE MY HAND IS SHOWING RIGHT NOW, AND THAT IS WHAT THE CITY IS GOING TO RETAIN FOR PARK FLAGG AND THEN ALSO POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF A STRUCTURE IN THE FUTURE.

I'LL GO OVER THE TERMS HERE IN JUST A MINUTE.

BUT THIS IS ANOTHER GRAPHIC AND IT'S REALLY BUSY.

I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT I WANTED TO SHOW IT TO YOU JUST FOR A COUPLE OF REASONS.

AGAIN, HERE'S PHASE ONE DOWN AT THE WEST END WITH THE BUILDING.

THESE ARE THE NEW BUS BAYS, THE CIVIC SPACE.

WHAT WE HAVE IMPOSED ON HERE IS THE CHANNEL FOR THE REAL FLIGHT FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT.

SO THIS IS AN UNDERGROUND CULVERT THAT COMES ON TO THE SITE FROM THE NORTH RIGHT DOWN THROUGH KIND OF WHERE THE BUS BAYS ARE OVER TO THE CIVIC SPACE. AND THEN YOU HAVE A CONFLUENCE.

THERE'S ANOTHER CHANNEL THAT'S GOING TO COME UP, MIKE'S PIKE.

AND THIS IS THE CONFLUENCE OF KIND OF THE UPPER REACH AND THE CLAY AVENUE, THE CLAY WASH, AND THEN IT'S GOING TO CONTINUE TO THE EAST.

[00:55:09]

AND SO THIS IS REALLY WHY THE PHASING IS SO IMPORTANT, RIGHT? AND SO THIS ALLOWS MOUNTAIN LINE TO PROCEED WITH PHASE ONE.

IT ALLOWS THE CITY TO DO THE RAIL DEFLECT FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT.

AND THEN THE CONCEPT IS ONCE THE FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT IS DONE, THEY'LL COME IN AND DO THEIR PHASE TWO.

I'LL GO BACK TO THE PRETTY PICTURE AND JUST TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE TERMS OF THE IGA.

AND SO IT IS A 50 YEAR TERM.

ESSENTIALLY, THE CITY IS GOING TO ALLOW THIS USE TO BE DEVELOPED AND MANAGED.

AS LONG AS MOUNTAIN LINE IS PROVIDING THE SERVICE CAN RENEW FOR AN ADDITIONAL 50 YEARS AGAIN AS LONG AS IT'S STILL OPERATING AS A DCC AND THEY'RE NOT IN DEFAULT OF THE AGREEMENT OR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.

IT ALLOWS FOR THESE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE TWO AREAS I'VE DESCRIBED.

SO ONE AREA IS GOING TO BE AGAIN CONSTRUCTED AND MANAGED BY MOUNTAIN LINE.

THE OTHER AREA WILL KIND OF BE RESERVED FOR THE CITY AND PARK FLAGG.

I'VE TALKED ABOUT THE TWO PHASES.

PHASE ONE IS THE BUILDING ESSENTIALLY.

PHASE TWO INCLUDES THE NEW BEST PHASE PARKING RECONFIGURATION IN THE CIVIC SPACE.

OF THE AGREEMENT INCLUDES A FEE IN LIEU.

SO MOUNTAIN LION IS GOING TO PAY $4,200 FOR EVERY PARKING SPACE THAT'S IMPACTED EITHER LOST OR NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED.

AND SO WE'RE ESTIMATING THAT TO BE ABOUT 77 SPACES.

THE AGREEMENT SAYS IT WON'T EXCEED 80, AND SO THE CITY WILL RECEIVE COMPENSATION.

AND THE IDEA IS THAT MONEY CAN THEN BE USED TO PUT BACK THE SPACES.

SO ONCE PHASE TWO IS DONE, IT GETS RECONFIGURED.

AND SO THERE'S COMPENSATION TO PUT BACK SPACES AS WELL AS FOR LOST SPACES.

AGAIN, IT ALLOWS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLAG FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT.

AND THEN WE MENTIONED A POTENTIAL FUTURE PARKING STRUCTURE.

AND SO YOU CAN SEE THAT ON HERE.

WE'VE CALLED THAT A PHASE THREE.

AND SO SHOULD THE CITY DECIDE TO DO A PARKING STRUCTURE IN THE FUTURE, WE FIGURED OUT THAT IT CONCEPTUALLY COULD HAPPEN IN THAT FOOTPRINT AND SO IT WOULD KIND OF BE CANTILEVERED OVER SOME OF THE BUS BAYS IS THE IDEA WOULD BE, AGAIN, ON THAT RESERVED AREA TO THE NORTH AND THEN PERHAPS CANTILEVERED.

AND SO THAT'S A FUTURE POSSIBILITY SHOULD THE CITY DECIDE WE WANT TO DO THAT.

AND THEN FINALLY THE AGREEMENT TALKS ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION.

WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION? WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE? ESSENTIALLY, MOUNTAIN LION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THEIR LEASED AREA FOR MAINTAINING THAT PROPERTY.

THE CITY IS GOING TO MAINTAIN THE CIVIC SPACE.

IT'S REALLY MORE IN LINE WITH WHAT WE DO WITH OUR PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAM.

AND SO WHEN THAT'S CONSTRUCTED, WE WOULD DO THE CIVIC SPACE MAINTENANCE AND THEN ALL THE PARKING AREAS.

OBVIOUSLY THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH A NUMBER OF POLICIES AND BOTH OUR CARBON NEUTRALITY PLAN AS WELL AS OUR REGIONAL PLAN.

I'VE TRIED TO PULL OUT SOME OF THE POLICIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION AND PROMOTING USE OF TRANSIT MODE SHIFT, GETTING SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICLES OFF THE ROAD.

THIS IS ALL PART OF THAT STRATEGY.

AND I BELIEVE THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO MENTION TONIGHT.

SO I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT THIS IG.

TAKE IT IN, COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

AND THEN. HI, DAN.

THERE WERE DISCUSSIONS GOING ON WITH AMTRAK ABOUT MOVING THE AMTRAK STATION TO THIS SITE AWAY FROM JUST TO THE EAST OF HERE.

ARE THOSE STILL GOING ON OR IS THAT DEAD OR WHAT'S GOING ON? NOW, I BELIEVE THE AMTRAK RELOCATION IS KIND OF PART OF THAT DOWNTOWN MILE CONSIDERATION.

SO ALL THESE PROJECTS GOING FROM THE FLORENCE WALNUT BIKE PED TUNNEL REALLY TO THE LONE TREE OVERPASS.

SO I THINK WE ARE WITHIN THAT DOWNTOWN MILE PLANNING ACCOMMODATING A POTENTIAL AMTRAK STATION.

I KNOW ONE OF THE IDEAS IS IF THE CITY WERE TO DO A STRUCTURE, COULD YOU INCORPORATE A.

A TRAIN STATION INTO THAT.

THAT'S BEEN PART OF THE DISCUSSION.

SO I KNOW CONCEPTUALLY IT'S ON THE TABLE.

I CAN'T TELL YOU WHAT THE IDEAS ARE FOR WHERE THAT WOULD GO.

SO YOU DON'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD BE IN THE PART.

ON THE LEFT SIDE, YOU'RE CALLING PHASE ONE OR IF IT WOULD BE LIKE PHASE THREE OR WHATEVER.

TO BE DETERMINED, I WOULD SAY TO BE DETERMINED.

THE DISCUSSIONS I'VE BEEN IN AND I'M PROBABLY NOT THE BEST ONE TO TALK ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT REALLY IS AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM, PARTLY DUE TO GRADES AND TRACK GRADES AND WHERE EVERYTHING LINES UP.

MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT WOULD POTENTIALLY BE MORE IN THAT PHASE THREE AREA OR TO THE EAST, MORE LIKELY TO THE EAST OF THIS SITE TO DO A SEPARATE AMTRAK LOADING.

JUST BECAUSE BY THE TIME YOU GET TO MILTON, YOU'VE GOT TO BE UP AT A CERTAIN GRADE AND TO GET OVER THE ROAD.

FIRST KIND OF FUN THINGS GEOMETRY AND PHYSICS.

MATH. MATH, COUNCIL MEMBER ASLAN? THANK YOU. SO, DAN, FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU FOR TEACHING ME A NEW WORD TODAY.

CANTILEVER, CANTILEVER, CANTILEVER.

I DIDN'T KNOW IT.

I'D NEVER HEARD THAT BEFORE, BUT I KNOW WHAT IT MEANS.

[01:00:03]

I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.

WHAT HAPPENS TO REMIND ME WHAT HAPPENS TO THE CURRENT EPA HEADQUARTERS ONCE THE THEY MOVE TO THESE NEW OFFICES AND EVERYTHING AND THE CUSTOMER SERVICE ELEMENT IS OVER HERE ON THE SIDE OF TOWN? I MEAN, I BELIEVE THEIR INTENTION IS TO STAY OVER WHERE THEY ARE ON THE EAST SIDE, THAT THEY NEED THOSE FACILITIES AND THOSE OFFICES.

BUT SOME OF THE FUNCTIONS WOULD COME OVER HERE.

AND THERE'S I MEAN, THEY HAVE A LOT OF WAREHOUSE SPACE OVER THERE WHERE THEY STORE BUSSES INDOORS AND DO MAINTENANCE AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S A SEPARATE OPERATION.

MY OTHER QUESTION IS I JUST I JUST WANT TO CONCEPTUALLY SORT OF UNDERSTAND THIS.

WHEN WE DO PHASE ONE OF THE DCC, ALL THAT UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE IS GOING TO BE PUT IN.

AND THE IDEA IS THAT WHEN WE GET BACK TO WORK ON WITH SHOVELS ON THE REST OF THE ON CONNECTING THE REAR TO FLAG FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT STUFF, THOSE THINGS WILL CONNECT UP.

SO PHASE ONE IS REALLY GOING TO JUST INCLUDE THAT WEST END OF THE SITE.

SO THE NEW BUILDING, THE UTILITIES, EVERYTHING REQUIRED FOR EVERYTHING.

GO BACK TO THE PICTURE FOR ME.

SO THIS ONE. YEAH.

YEAH. SO I SEE THAT AND I UNDERSTAND THAT.

I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, IF IF KNOCK ON WOOD, THE REST OF OUR REGIONAL FLAG EFFORTS FALL THROUGH OR DON'T GET FUNDED FOR YEARS OR THERE'S SOME DELAYS OR WHATEVER, THAT INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE THERE AND IT WILL SOMEHOW BE CLOSED OFF UNTIL IT'S READY TO LINK UP.

YEAH. SO THE IDEA WAS THE PHASE ONE CONSTRUCTION WILL PROCEED.

THEY'LL HAVE THEIR NEW DOWNTOWN FACILITY AND THEN THE BUS BAY CONFIGURATION REMAINS.

THAT IS AS IT IS TODAY, ALONG WITH ALL THE PARKING REALLY UNTIL THE RAIL FLAG COMES THROUGH.

THEN WE DO THE REAL FLAG PROJECT.

A LOT OF THIS GETS SHUT DOWN DURING THAT.

AND THEN WHEN IT'S ALL PUT BACK.

PARK FLAG WILL PUT BACK ITS PARKING IN THE AREAS HERE THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE RESERVED AREA AND THEN.

BOB LITTLE CONSTRUCT THEIR BUS BAYS IN THE CIVIC SPACE AND SO THAT UNDERGROUND CULVERT STUFF THAT'S JUST IT'S THERE IT'S READY TO PLUG AND PLAY.

IT'S NOT THERE TODAY. RIGHT.

IT GETS CONSTRUCTED SOMETIME BETWEEN PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO IS WHAT WE'RE ANTICIPATING.

SO, YEAH, IT'S IT'S TO THE EAST OF PHASE ONE ENOUGH THAT THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE DIGGING ANY TUNNELS OVER IN THAT SPACE.

EXACTLY. OKAY, GREAT.

NOW, PHASE ONE WILL BE BUILT AND THEY'LL BE ABLE TO OPERATE DURING THE REAL FLIGHT CONSTRUCTION.

AND SOME OF THAT JUST HAPPENED RECENTLY, RIGHT ON THE PHOENIX.

THAT'S WHY PHOENIX WAS CLOSED FOR SUCH A LONG TIME.

THERE WAS A BRIDGE. REPLACE IT.

YES. YEP. THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.

OKAY. SO THAT'S NOW THAT'S DIFFERENT.

THAT DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH THE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE.

YEAH. I MEAN, THIS BRIDGE ACCOMMODATES THE CURRENT CHANNEL OF THE RAIL, THE FLAG.

IT GOES UNDER HERE. GOTCHA.

THAT'S ALL DIVERTED.

THE NEW CHANNEL WILL BE COMING OUT.

SORRY FOR THESE BASIC QUESTIONS.

I'M JUST TRYING TO GO BACK AND UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE STUFF AT A BASIC LEVEL, IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO ADD CITY MANAGER, FEEL FREE.

MAYOR, IF I CAN RESPOND.

VERY GOOD QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.

THE PHOENIX BRIDGE AVENUE, WHILE IT RELATES, WAS A BIT OF A STANDALONE PROJECT AND THAT WAS ONE THAT HAD TO HAPPEN FROM A TIMING STANDPOINT BECAUSE OF THE STATE OF DECLINE OF THAT BRIDGE.

AND SO WE JUST SIMPLY COULD NOT WAIT.

HAD THE TIMING BEEN PERFECT FOR US, IT ALL WOULD HAVE HAPPENED AT THE SAME TIME, AND THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN WRAPPED INTO THE RIO PROJECT.

BUT WE'RE YEARS AWAY FROM THIS PART OF THE RAIL PROJECT, WHICH BY THE WAY IS ALSO A PHASE PROJECT.

SO THE PHENIX BRIDGE HAD TO HAPPEN AND IT WON'T BE WITHOUT BENEFIT.

WE HAVE A NEW BRIDGE AND IT WILL CONTINUE TO BE USED.

THE WHAT WILL CHANGE ULTIMATELY IS THE ROUTE OF THE CHANNEL, BUT THAT'S YEARS AWAY.

GOT IT NOW? YEAH. THANKS.

YEAH, THANK YOU. DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT.

THAT'S ALL. WATER UNDER THE BRIDGE AT THIS POINT.

OKAY. YEAH.

COME ON, MCCARTHY. TIME TO STEP UP YOUR GAME.

THANK YOU FOR THOSE CLARIFYING QUESTIONS.

I REALLY APPRECIATE JUST EXPLORING ALL THAT A LITTLE BIT FURTHER.

ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? BECAUSE OF OURSELVES. I'M READY TO MAKE A MOTION.

ALL RIGHT. GO FOR IT.

I MOVE TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-32 BY TITLE ONLY.

I SECOND THAT MOTION.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ALL RIGHT.

CITY CLERK? A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NORTHERN ARIZONA INTERGOVERNMENTAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

[01:05:06]

MOUNTAIN LINE AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR THE DOWNTOWN CONNECTION CENTER.

MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-33.

I SECOND THAT.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ALL RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OPPOSED? CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM 12D.

[D. Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-15: An ordinance amending Flagstaff City Code, Chapter 1-14, Personnel System, and the Employee Handbook of Regulations Section 1-10-70, Employee Advisory Committee, to reorganize and add member representation based on recent changes to the City’s organizational chart and authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE’s). STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: At the June 21, 2022 Council Meeting: 1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-15 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-15 by title only (if approved above) At the June 21, 2022 Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-15 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-15 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-15]

THIS IS THE CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-15, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 TO 14 PERSONNEL SYSTEM AND THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK OF REGULATIONS SECTION 1-10-70 EMPLOYEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO REORGANIZE AND REORGANIZE AND ADD MEMBER REPRESENTATION BASED ON RECENT CHANGES TO THE CITY'S ORGANIZATIONAL CHART AND AUTHORIZED FULL TIME EQUIVALENTS.

JEANNIE, TAKE US AWAY.

GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN.

MAYOR, VICE MAYOR AND COUNCIL JEANNIE GALLAGHER, HUMAN RESOURCE CONTRACT EXECUTIVE.

SO THIS IS ACTUALLY AN EXCITING TIME FOR THE EMPLOYEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WITH A LITTLE BIT OF GROWTH TO THE ORGANIZATION AND RESTRUCTURING THAT IS GOING TO BRING SOME ADDITIONAL MEMBERSHIP TO THIS VERY VALUABLE EMPLOYEE BODY.

I DO NOT HAVE A PRESENTATION OR PICTURES.

HOWEVER, IN BRIEF, WE HAVE SEEN SUFFICIENT EMPLOYEE GROWTH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, WHICH ADMINISTERS OUR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP IS MADE UP OF THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, THE CITY ATTORNEY'S, HUMAN RESOURCES, RISK MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC AFFAIRS, SUSTAINABILITY AND THE CLERK'S OFFICE.

WE'VE ALSO SEEN SUFFICIENT GROWTH IN OUR NON COMMISSIONED AS WELL AS OUR COMMISSIONED POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL, OUR FIRE PERSONNEL AND IN ECONOMIC VITALITY TO ADD ADDITIONAL MEMBERS TO THOSE RESPECTIVE GROUPS.

AND IN ADDITION, WE HAVE CITY ENGINEERING AS THE STANDALONE DIVISION AS OF A FEW MONTHS AGO, WHICH IS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO HAVE ITS OWN MEMBERS, AS WELL AS THE PARKS, RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND EVENTS ALSO KNOWN AS PROS GROUP, WHICH IS OF A SUFFICIENT SIZE TO HAVE THEIR OWN MEMBERSHIP AS WELL.

SO IN TOTAL WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF RESHUFFLING, BUT ALSO AN ADDITION OF EIGHT REGULAR AND EIGHT ALTERNATE MEMBERS TO THE EMPLOYEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

SO WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, JEANNIE. COUNCIL, ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT.

WELL, I MOVE TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-15 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

I'LL SECOND. SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ALL RIGHT.

CITY CLERK? AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE CHAPTER 114 PERSONNEL SYSTEM IN THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK OF REGULATIONS SECTION 1-10-70 EMPLOYEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES.

SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THANK YOU, CITY CLERK.

WHAT BRINGS US TO AGENDA ITEM 12E.

CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-30.

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN VP66 AND WOODY MOUNTAIN, LLC IN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT.

MAYOR, I THINK I THINK WE HAVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 2022-15.

UM, THAT'S THE ONE WE JUST DID THE CLARIFICATION ON THAT 2022-15 IS THE ONE THAT WE JUST DID WITH REGARDS TO THE EMPLOYEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. OH, NO, I'M SORRY.

THIS WAS JUST THE FIRST READ TONIGHT.

THE SECOND READ WILL OCCUR ON JULY 5TH.

YEAH, I THINK THAT JUST MIGHT BE A LITTLE TYPO WITH THE.

YEAH. JULY 5TH RATHER THAN THE JUNE 21ST FOR THE ADOPTION.

APOLOGIES FOR THE MISPRINT.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO DETAIL ON THAT.

WE'LL TALK TO YOUR NEW SUPERVISOR ABOUT THAT.

SHE SHE WAITED TILL AFTER WE MADE HER DIVISION STATUS.

I REALLY JUST WANTED TO SEE IF YOU'D CATCH IT.

ALL RIGHTY. WELL, WE ARE DOWN TO THAT.

AGENDA ITEM 12E REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH VP66 AND WOODY MOUNTAIN LLC IN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT

[E. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-30: A resolution authorizing the execution of a Development Agreement between VP66 & Woody Mountain, LLC and the City of Flagstaff related to the development of approximately 197.58 acres of real property generally located at 3425 W Route 66 known as Timber Sky. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: If Council desires to approve the 4th Amendment to the Timber Sky Annexation and Development Agreement: 1) Read Resolution No. 2022-30 by title only 2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-30 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No.2022-30]

OF APPROXIMATELY 197.58 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 3425 WEST ROUTE 66, KNOWN AS TIMBER SKY.

[01:10:09]

MS. ANTOL? THANK YOU SO MUCH, MAYOR.

COUNCIL. TIFFANY ANTOL I DO NOT HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR YOU TONIGHT.

YOU'VE HAD SEVERAL ALREADY.

SO YESTERDAY YOU DID RECEIVE AN UPDATED VERSION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS GENERAL CLEANUP ITEMS, BUT THERE WERE PROVISIONS THAT DID CHANGE IN REGARDS TO THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION FEES.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO TRY TO ANSWER THEM.

CHRISTINA IS REALLY THE SHE'S REALLY THE MAGIC.

I JUST STAND UP HERE FOR HER SOMETIMES.

SO WE'LL WE WILL DO OUR BEST TONIGHT.

AND IF YOU NEED ANYTHING FROM US, LET US KNOW.

Q. I WAS JUST CURIOUS HOW MUCH ARE THE HOA FEES THAT HABITAT WOULD BE TAKING ON IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCE? I ACTUALLY DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION.

I DON'T KNOW IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT AND THEY HAVE THAT INFORMATION.

I SEE.

WELL, HOW ABOUT THIS? ERIC, WOULD YOU MIND COMING DOWN AND JUST? I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE HABITAT'S ALL GOOD WITH THIS CHANGE.

IT SEEMS LIKE THE ONLY ONE WORTH MAKING SURE EVERYONE'S GOT A GOOD WITH MOVING FORWARD SINCE WE HASHED IT OUT LAST WEEK.

ABSOLUTELY. MAYOR. VICE MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS, CITY MANAGER AND STAFF, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

YES, WE ARE AWARE OF THIS SMALL LITTLE CHANGE AND HABITAT IS DEFINITELY ON BOARD AND MAKING SURE THAT THIS DOES NOT FINANCIALLY NEGATIVE NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR HOMEOWNERS.

SO AS YOU MENTIONED WITH A DIFFERENT ITEM EARLIER, IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO GO AFTER GRANTS AND FUNDING DOLLARS TO TRY TO OFFSET THOSE COSTS.

OKAY. THANK YOU. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE COMFORTABLE WITH IT.

COUNCIL MEMBER ASLAN YEAH, I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT.

I, JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE PUBLIC, I'D LIKE TO BACK UP A SECOND.

WE'VE BEEN TALKING A LOT ABOUT THESE CHANGES, BUT WE HAVEN'T REALLY SPELLED THEM OUT.

CAN YOU TAKE A MOMENT? JUST SUMMARIZE WHAT ARE ENTAILED IN THE CHANGES AND.

I JUST THINK THAT WOULD BE PRUDENT.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL CHRISTINA RUBALCAVA, SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.

SO THE CHANGES AND THE CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE AND UPLOADED INTO AGENDA QUICK.

SO IF THE PUBLIC WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT THOSE THERE AS WELL, THERE ARE A FEW CLEANUP ITEMS, CAPITALIZATIONS, THINGS LIKE THAT.

THERE WAS A.

LET ME LOOK AT IT RIGHT HERE.

SO I MAKE SURE I'M SAYING IT CORRECTLY.

THERE WAS A VERY MINOR WORDSMITHING CHANGE REGARDING THAT.

THE OWNER WHO HAS A TITLE TO BLOCK TO WILL WORK IN GOOD FAITH WITH THE OWNER OF THE HABITAT PROPERTY TO ENSURE CROSS ACCESS FOR RETENTION, DETENTION AND UTILITIES.

THE LANGUAGE BEFORE IMPLIED THAT VINTAGE PARTNERS WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKING WITH ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN TIMBER SKY, WHICH WAS NEVER THE CASE.

IT WAS ALWAYS BLOCKED, TOO. THAT'S THE PARCEL THAT'S ADJACENT.

THAT'S WHERE THE ACCESS WOULD NEED TO BE.

THAT'S WHERE THE DETENTION WOULD NEED TO BE.

SO THAT WAS JUST A CLEANUP.

THE ONE THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THAT WAS MORE OF A SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE.

IS THE AGREEMENT AS DRAFTED BEFORE DID SAY THAT NO INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNER IN THE HABITAT AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT WOULD PAY AND HOA FEE THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED.

INSTEAD, IT'S NOW GOING TO SAY THAT HABITAT WILL PAY THAT FEE.

IT WILL BE PAID BY THE HOMEOWNER TO HABITAT AND THEN HABITAT WILL GO AHEAD AND REMIT THAT TO THE HOA.

AND THAT IS REALLY TO PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE CC+RS AND MAKE SURE THEY'RE BEING FOLLOWED AND TO WARD OFF ANY POTENTIAL CHALLENGE TO THAT. AND SO AND IF THE HOMEOWNER DID REQUEST THAT THEY WANTED TO PAY THOSE FEES DIRECTLY THEMSELVES, FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEY WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT.

THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOU ARTICULATING THOSE CLARIFICATIONS OUT LOUD.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. AND JUST TO GET A CLARIFICATION AS AN ADD ON TO THAT, IF FOR SOME REASON THESE ARE NOT BUILT WITHIN FIVE YEARS AND THE THE LAND REVERTS TO THE CITY, ARE WE NOW IN CHARGE OF THE HOA FEES? HOW DOES THAT WORK? RIGHT. SO THE WAY IT'S DRAFTED IS THAT BETWEEN HABITAT, THE CITY AND THE HOMEOWNERS, THE CITY IS NOT THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR HOA FEES.

I THINK IF WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO LOOK AT A REVERSION, WE'LL HAVE TO LOOK AT HOW THAT RESTRICTIVE COVENANT LANGUAGE IS DRAFTED.

OUR HOPE WOULD BE THAT AT THE TIME THAT WE THEN DECIDED TO USE THAT PROPERTY FOR SOME SORT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IF WE WANTED THE RESIDENTS TO BE PART OF THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AND ENJOY THOSE AMENITIES, THAT FEE WOULD HAVE TO BE PAID.

AND I THINK WE'D HAVE TO LOOK AT THE TIME AT WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE.

IF IT WAS RENTAL, IF IT WAS OWNERSHIP, IF IT WAS OWNERSHIP, IT WOULD PROBABLY BE THOSE INDIVIDUALS, IF IT WOULD BE A RENTAL.

AND I THINK WHOEVER MANAGES IT, POTENTIALLY THE CITY WOULD BE ON THE HOOK.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

YEAH. COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

[01:15:03]

YEAH. I'LL JUST NOTE THAT OVER THE WEEKEND I HAD A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS ABOUT RHODES.

AND YOU SAW WHAT THESE AND OTHER ISSUES.

AND ERIC AND TIFFANY AND CHRISTINA ANSWERED ALL MY QUESTIONS.

SO I JUST WANT TO THANK THE THREE OF YOU PUBLICLY FOR GETTING BACK TO ME.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION UNLESS THERE'S OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.

COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS. I MOVE TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-30 BY TITLE ONLY.

I'LL SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE TIMBER SKY ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AND VP66 AND WOODY MOUNTAIN, LLC.

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-30.

SECOND. MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? THAT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM 12F CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-29.

[F. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-29: A resolution approving the Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Flagstaff and Coconino County for election services for the August 2, 2022 Primary Election and November 8, 2022 General Election STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read Resolution No. 2022-29 by title only 2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-29 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-29]

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AND COCONINO COUNTY FOR ELECTION SERVICES FOR THE AUGUST 2ND, 2022 PRIMARY ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022.

GENERAL ELECTION CITY.

GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL STACEY SALTZBURG, CITY CLERK.

THE RESOLUTION BEFORE YOU IS TO APPROVE AN IGA WITH COCONINO COUNTY, SPECIFICALLY THEIR ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT, TO CONDUCT BOTH THE AUGUST AND NOVEMBER ELECTIONS FOR 2022.

I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS, IF YOU HAVE ANY.

I MOVE TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-29 BY TITLE ONLY.

I'LL SECOND. SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

CITY CLERK? A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AND COCONINO COUNTY FOR ELECTION SERVICES FOR THE AUGUST 2ND, 2022 PRIMARY ELECTION AND NOVEMBER EIGHT, 2022 GENERAL ELECTION.

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-29.

SECOND. SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR SWEET.

AGENDA ITEM 12G IS CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-34, A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL ORDERING AND CALLING A SPECIAL BOND

[G. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-34: A resolution of the Flagstaff City Council ordering and calling a Special Bond Election of the City for November 8, 2022, in conjunction with the City's General Election, to submit two bond questions to the qualified electors of Flagstaff with respect to selling and issuing general obligation bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $77,285,000, to be repaid with secondary property taxes STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read Resolution No. 2022-34 by title only 2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-34 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-34]

ELECTION IN THE CITY FOR NOVEMBER 8, 2022, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO BOND QUESTIONS, THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF FLAGSTAFF RESPECT TO SELLING AND ISSUING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF 77,285,000 TO BE REPAID WITH SECONDARY PROPERTY TAXES.

CITY CLERK? HELLO AGAIN. SO THANK YOU, MAYOR.

YOU INTRODUCED THIS QUITE WELL.

THE RESOLUTION IS TO CALL OUR SPECIAL BOND ELECTION FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022 ELECTION.

AT THE JUNE 7TH MEETING, COUNCIL GAVE DIRECTION TO STAFF FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM OUR CITIZEN BOND COMMITTEE TO BRING FORWARD TWO BOND QUESTIONS TO THE VOTERS IN NOVEMBER.

ONE OF THOSE QUESTIONS WOULD BE RELATED TO WATER AND FIRE INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE OTHER WOULD BE FOR HOUSING.

PROPOSITION 441 IS FOR THE INVESTMENT IN THE CITY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT, STORM WATER FLOOD MITIGATION AND WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION INFRASTRUCTURE.

PROPOSITION 442 WILL SUPPORT THE CREATION OF RENTAL AND HOME OWNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES IN FLAGSTAFF.

SO YOU WILL SEE HERE THE ENTIRETY OF THE QUESTION FOR PROPOSITION 441.

I WILL NOT READ IT WORD FOR WORD, BUT THE TOTAL AMOUNT REQUESTED IS 57,285,000.

AND THIS IS TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF SPRUCE WASH, INCREASE WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY, IMPLEMENT ENERGY EFFICIENCY UPGRADES AT THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS, AND ALSO REPLACE WILDFIRE VEHICLES.

AND THIS IS THE QUESTION FOR PROPOSITION 442.

THE TOTAL AMOUNT REQUESTED IS $20 MILLION, AND THIS IS TO REDEVELOP CITY OWNED HOUSING, TO CREATE AFFORDABLE RENTALS, REPURPOSE EXISTING BUILDINGS INTO RENTAL UNITS, INCENTIVIZE THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO INCLUDE AFFORDABLE RENTALS INTO THEIR DEVELOPMENTS, AND ALSO TO EXPAND THE HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

[01:20:10]

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COUNCIL READ AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-34 TO CALL THE SPECIAL BOND ELECTION FOR NOVEMBER 2022.

AND THEN FOLLOWING THAT CALL FOR THE ELECTION OF REQUEST FOR ARGUMENTS BOTH FOR AND AGAINST, THE TWO PROPOSITIONS WILL BE ANNOUNCED AND SOLICITED FROM THE PUBLIC.

I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

UH, ARE THOSE QUESTION MARKS AT THE VERY END GOING TO BE THERE OR.

YES, THEY ACTUALLY WILL BE THERE BECAUSE THE WAY THAT THE QUESTION IS PHRASED IT IS TO CREATE X, Y AND Z.

SHALL THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF BE AUTHORIZED TO DO THESE FOUR THINGS? GOTCHA. I WAS LIKE WONKY SPENDING OUR HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, MAYBE.

I DON'T KNOW.

YEAH, IT IS. IT'S KIND OF AN INTERESTING WAY THAT THOSE ARE SET OUT.

BUT YES, THAT IS INTENTIONALLY THERE.

SOUNDS GOOD.

I'M SURE THERE WAS GOING TO BE A REASON FOR IT.

COUNCIL MEMBER ASLAN, I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.

SO FIRST OF ALL, JUST A QUICK STATEMENT OR COMMENT.

I'M REALLY SORRY I WASN'T ABLE TO BE PART OF THIS CONVERSATION A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO.

I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE BEEN, BUT THAT'S HOW THESE THINGS PAN OUT SOMETIMES, AND I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT WENT INTO THIS AND DEFINITELY I'LL BE VOTING IN SUPPORT OF THIS.

I FULLY SUPPORT THE WILL OF COUNCIL ON HOW THIS CAME DOWN.

SO I'VE BEEN READING IN THE PAPER RECENTLY LOTS OF OTHER BOND ISSUES AROUND FOR CITY OF FLAGSTAFF VOTERS TO BE CONSIDERING.

CAN YOU KIND OF RUN THROUGH SOME OF THOSE RIGHT NOW? I THINK WE'VE. WAS IT IN TODAY'S PAPER? WE JUST LEARNED THAT.

YEAH. IF YOU PUT 100 MILLION IS PUTTING ONE ON AND THEN IF YOU COULD JUST RUN THROUGH SOME OF THOSE FOR ME REAL QUICKLY, IF YOU'RE ABLE TO, I'D APPRECIATE IT.

SURE. SO AS YOU MENTIONED, THE FUSD DID PUT FORWARD AN INTENT TO PUT A QUESTION FOR $100 MILLION BOND QUESTION ON THE BALLOT.

WE ALSO HAVE COCONINO COUNTY THAT WILL BE PUTTING FORWARD THE JAIL DISTRICT TAX.

THAT WILL ALSO BE ON.

THOSE ARE THE ONLY THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO THAT THAT I AM AWARE OF AT THIS POINT.

WELL, CCC JUST HAD THEIR ELECTION A FEW MONTHS AGO.

THAT WORKED OUT. THAT DID PASS FOR THEM.

YES. YEAH. BY A GOOD MARGIN.

60/40 I THINK IT WAS SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

THANKS FOR THE ADDITIONAL CONTEXT THERE.

YOU KNOW, AND WE'RE ENTERING TRYING TIMES FINANCIALLY IN A LOT OF WAYS ON EVERY LEVEL.

SO JUST APPRECIATE THE CONSIDERATION THAT WENT INTO ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE BEING CONSIDERED AND SOME OF THESE THINGS WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO RETURN TO AT A LATER TIME.

I HATE TO KICK THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD ON SOME OF THIS STUFF, BUT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF EMERGENCIES AND CRISES RIGHT NOW AND THERE'S NOT A LOT OF MONEY FREE FLOWING AND JUST WANT TO RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT HARD CHOICES HAD TO BE MADE.

AND I LOOK FORWARD TO REVISITING SOME OF THESE OTHER MATTERS AS AS THE LANDSCAPE ALLOWS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER ASLAN.

COUNCIL MEMBER SALAS? MR. CLIFTON HAS A QUESTION.

OH. OH.

CITY. CITY MANAGER.

YES. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MARY. THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER.

THIS MIGHT BE A QUICK ONE.

COULD YOU PLEASE CITY CLERK BACK UP A FRAME OR TWO? YES. THIS IS FORMAT ONLY, BUT UNDER PROPOSITION FOUR FOR ONE, WE LEAD OFF BY TALKING ABOUT WASTEWATER TREATMENT.

AND THEN THE SECOND ITEM IS STORM WATER FLOOD MITIGATION.

NOW, IF YOU ADVANCE THE SLIDE HERE, WE STATED IN THE ORDER THAT I THINK IS ALWAYS BEEN PRESENTED, WHICH IS SPRUCE WASH AND FLOOD WATER CAPACITY COMING FIRST, WASTEWATER COMING SECOND.

I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS JUST IN THE PRESENTATION, BUT I'M WONDERING IF WE COULD REARRANGE PROPOSITION 441 TO FOLLOW THAT SAME SEQUENCING OR LISTING OF PROJECTS SO THAT IT TRACKS THE SAME THROUGHOUT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR POINTING THAT OUT.

I BELIEVE THAT WE BASED ON THE DIRECTION THAT WE HAD GOTTEN FROM COUNCIL, THEY WANTED THAT SPRUCE WASH TO BE THAT FIRST LISTED ITEM.

SO WHAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE UNDER THE PROPOSITION LANGUAGE IS CORRECT.

SO IT WAS IT WAS MORE OF A FORMATTING WITHIN THE PRESENTATION ITSELF.

SO AGAIN, THANK YOU.

I APOLOGIZE FOR THE CONFUSION THERE.

[01:25:01]

NO REASON, ACTUALLY A CITY MANAGER, YOU WERE RIGHT ON POINT AND SOMETHING I WAS GOING TO COMMENT ON, I WOULD STRONGLY SUGGEST ACTUALLY WE START WITH REPLACING WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION ENGINES TO THE TOP, FOLLOWED BY FLOODWATERS AND THEN THE WASTEWATER.

I THINK WHEN PEOPLE ARE LOOKING AT THAT BALLOT AND TAKING A QUICK SCAN, THE FIRST THING THEY'RE GOING TO SEE IF IT'S REPLACING WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION ENGINES.

I THINK THAT'S GOING TO CATCH AN EYE AND HELP TO TO GET THIS THROUGH WITH THE VOTERS.

SO IF WE START WITH FIRE, THEN GO TO STORM WATER AND THEN TO WASTE WATER.

I THINK IT MIGHT HAVE MORE IMPACT, BUT.

JUST THROWN OUT THERE. CITY ATTORNEY.

MAYOR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

IF I MAY, A MOTION CAN BE MADE TONIGHT.

NONETHELESS, AN ACTION CAN BE TAKEN CONTINGENT UPON THE REORDERING OF THOSE.

I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT FOR THE COUNCIL.

YOU DON'T NEED TO WAIT FOR THIS TO COME BACK TO YOU IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION OR ANOTHER COUNCIL MEMBER WANTS TO MAKE A MOTION CONTINGENT UPON THOSE CHANGES.

THANK YOU. AND I WOULD I'D LOVE TO HEAR WHAT OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS SAY, BUT I WANT TO GET THIS ONE THROUGH, ESPECIALLY.

AND WHEN YOU SAY WILDFIRE AND FLOOD WATERS, THOSE TEND TO BE THE SOLID POINTS THAT PEOPLE IN, FROM WHAT I HEAR EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE REALLY CARE ABOUT.

SO BUT THOUGHTS FROM COUNCIL.

I. I MOVED TO.

LET'S GET THIS ON HERE READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020 234 BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE REORDERING AS SUCH THAT WE START WITH WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION ENGINES FOLLOWED BY FLOOD WATERS WITH SPRUCE WASH AND THEN THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND THEN FORTH THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY UPGRADES.

I'LL SECOND THAT. SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.