[1. Call to Order NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the Commission and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the Commission may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).]

THANK YOU, EVERYONE, FOR YOUR PATIENCE.

OKAY, WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.

ALL RIGHT, THIS IS COMMISSIONER MANDINO AND VICE CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND I'D LIKE TO CALL THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, JULY 27, 2022, TO ORDER , AND PURSUANT TO ARS38-32.02 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AND TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT AT THIS REGULAR MEETING THE COMMISSION MAY VOTE TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION, WHICH WILL NOT BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

SO THAT WOULD BE FOR LEGAL ADVICE AND DISCUSSION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEYS FOR LEGAL ADVICE ON ANY ITEMS LISTED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA PURSUANT TO ARS38-431.03 A3.

[2. Roll Call NOTE: One or more Commission Members may be in attendance telephonically or by other technological means. MARIE JONES, CHAIR CAROLE MANDINO, VICE CHAIR DR. RICARDO GUTHRIE MARY NORTON DR. ALEX MARTINEZ BOB HARRIS III LLOYD PAUL ]

AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO HAVE THE ROLL CALL.

MARINE JONES, RICARDO GUTHRIE AND LLOYD POE ARE ALL EXCUSED.

THANK YOU. SO THAT MEANS WE DO HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT.

AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO OPEN UP PUBLIC COMMENT.

AT THIS TIME, ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTION THAT IS NOT SCHEDULED BEFORE THE COMMISSION TODAY DUE TO OPEN MEETING LAWS.

THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR ACT ON ITEMS PRESENTED DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA.

TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA.

PLEASE WAIT FOR ME TO CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AT THAT TIME.

AT THE TIME THE AGENDA ITEM IS HEARD.

IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? SEEING NO HANDS UP OR HEARING ANYONE.

[4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the minutes from the regular meeting on Wednesday, June 22, 2022.]

I WILL MOVE ON TO APPROVAL OF MINUTES.

SO THAT WOULD BE FROM THE REGULAR MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22ND.

THIS IS COMMISSIONER NORTON.

I MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22ND, AS WRITTEN.

IS THERE A SECOND? THIS IS COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ.

I SECOND IT. SO A MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. ANY OPPOSED.

THANK YOU. THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED AS WRITTEN.

[A. Request a Planning and Zoning Commission member to join the Commission on Council Salaries.]

I'LL MOVE ON TO GENERAL BUSINESS AND THERE'S A REQUEST OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMBER TO JOIN THE COMMISSION ON COUNCIL SALARIES.

SO, IS THERE A STAFF REPORT ON THIS? HELLO, CHAIR MANDINO.

MY NAME IS SHANNON ANDERSON.

I'M A SENIOR DEPUTY CITY MANAGER HERE WITH THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

IF IT'S ALL RIGHT, I WILL EXPLAIN WHAT THIS AGENDA ITEM IS AND EXPRESS THE REQUESTS THAT WE HAVE FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TODAY.

[INAUDIBLE] THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. SO WE DO HAVE A CITY CODE THAT COVERS SPECIFICS FOR THE SALARIES THAT ARE GIVEN BOTH TO OUR MAYOR AS WELL AS ALL OF OUR COUNCIL MEMBERS.

THIS CODE ALSO OUTLINES THE PROCESS THAT WE USE TO CONSIDER ANY CHANGES TO THAT SALARY, AND SO AS PART OF THAT PROCESS, THE CODE NAMES FIVE OF OUR COMMISSIONS WHERE WE ARE TO ASK A MEMBER FROM EACH OF THESE COMMISSIONS TO SERVE ON OUR CITIZEN COMMISSION FOR COUNCIL SALARIES.

WE HAD RECEIVED A REQUEST FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL QUITE A TIME BACK.

IT WAS ACTUALLY THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL, BUT WE'VE BEEN STRUGGLING TO FILL THE FOUR COMMUNITY AT LARGE VACANCIES.

WE HAVE FINALLY ACCOMPLISHED THAT.

SO NOW WE ARE DOING OUR ROUNDS TO THE FIVE COMMISSION MEETINGS TO DETERMINE WHO FROM YOUR COMMISSION WOULD BE WILLING TO

[00:05:02]

SERVE ON THE CITIZEN COMMISSION FOR COUNCIL SALARIES.

THE GOAL OF THIS COMMISSION IS TO REVIEW SALARY INFORMATION AND THEN TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.

THE PROCESS USUALLY TAKES ABOUT 2 TO 3 MEETINGS, AND THE MEETINGS ARE ABOUT AN HOUR IN LENGTH.

SO IT'S A SHORT TERM ASSIGNMENT, NOT AS SIGNIFICANT PROBABLY COMPARED TO THE WORK THAT YOU DO ON THIS COMMISSION, AS WELL AS A RECENT CITIZEN BOND COMMISSION. IT'S A MORE SHORT TERM ASSIGNMENT.

SO I'M HERE TODAY TO SEE WHO FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MIGHT BE WILLING TO SERVE IN THIS CAPACITY.

THIS IS COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ.

CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION? OVER WHAT PERIOD OF TIME DID YOU SAY THIS VOLUNTEER WOULD SERVE? SO WE ARE LOOKING TO START OUR FIRST MEETING, HOPEFULLY IN SEPTEMBER, DEPENDING ON HOW LATE WE GET OUR START.

THIS ASSIGNMENT COULD BE DONE IN SEPTEMBER, BUT LATEST, PROBABLY OCTOBER.

OKAY, WELL, I WOULD LIKE TO THROW MY NAME IN THE HAT FOR THAT.

THANK YOU. OKAY, IF THERE'S NO OTHER COMMISSIONERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO FILL THAT SPOT, THEN WE DO HAVE A COMMISSIONER THAT HAS.

OFFERED UP THEIR ASSISTANCE.

IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WAS INTERESTED? ALL RIGHT, THEN I THINK WE CAN GO WITH COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ TO FILL THAT SPOT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

HAVE A GREAT DAY. THANK YOU.

[B. Preliminary Plat PZ-15-00015-24 Sirius at Timber Sky - Block 4 Capstone Homes requests Preliminary Plat approval for Sirius at Timber Sky - Block 4 located at 3191 McAllister Ranch Road, a 63 lot single-family subdivision on 21.82 acres in the Single-Family Residential (R1) Zone. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission, in accordance with the findings presented in this report, forward the Preliminary Plat to the City Council with a recommendation of approval with the following conditions. The applicant shall provide the purpose of each tract on the final plat. The final plat shall show the patent as shown on Sheet 2 of the preliminary plat and on the Timber Sky Final Block Plat. All lots shown with less than a 60-foot lot width at the 25-foot front setback shall have building envelopes with front setbacks set at the point where the lot width is 60 feet. A note shall be added to the lot typical identifying which lots have alternative front setbacks.]

UNDER GENERAL BUSINESS ITEM B IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT PZ 15-00015-24 SIRUIS AT TIMBER SKY BLOCK FOUR, AND THAT'S THAT CAPSTONE HOMES REQUEST A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED BY APPROVAL FOR SERIOUS AT TIMBER SKY.

I HOPE I'M PRONOUNCING THAT RIGHT.

BLOCK FOUR LOCATED AT 3191 MCALLISTER RANCH ROAD, WHICH IS A 63 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON 21.82 ACRES IN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ARE ONE ZONE, AND IF WE HAVE A STAFF REPORT.

YES. JUST BEAR WITH ME A MOMENT WHILE I SHARE MY SCREEN.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

MY NAME IS BEN MEJIA.

I'M A PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

WE HAVE A REQUEST FROM CAPSTONE HOMES FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF SERIOUS SEPTEMBER SKY AS A SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION OF A 21.2 ACRE BLOCK TO RESULT IN 63 LOTS IN THE R-1 ZONE WITHIN THE RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY.

[INAUDIBLE] STAFF APPROVED THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT ON JUNE 7TH, 2022.

THERE ARE THREE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

WE'LL GO OVER THE CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT THE PRESENTATION.

THE SUBJECT'S SITE IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE TIMBER SKY DEVELOPMENT AREA AT THE INTERSECTION OF MCALLISTER RANCH ROAD AND SOUTH WOODY MOUNTAIN ROAD AND ABUTS TIMBER SKY BLOCK 3B AND SKY COTTAGES TO THE NORTH.

TIMBER SKY BLOCK FIVE TO THE WEST AND PRESIDIO TO THE EAST.

THE SITE IS ALSO BUFFERED TO THE SOUTH BY I-40.

THE ANNEXATION AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT WERE APPROVED FOR THE TIMBER SKY DEVELOPMENT IN 2016, WHICH PROPOSED A MAXIMUM OF 1300 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS.

THE SITE IS ENCUMBERED BY A FEDERAL PATENT ACROSS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE.

THE DEVELOPABILITY OF LAND SUBJECT TO THE PATENT IS A MATTER BETWEEN THE APPLICANT, THE STATE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE AND HAS PROVIDED AN OPINION FROM THEIR LEGAL COUNSEL THAT DEVELOPMENT CAN PROCEED.

THIS LEGAL OPINION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

THE CITY TAKES NO POSITION ON THE DEVELOPER ABILITY OF THE LAND.

HOWEVER, SHOULD THE COMMISSION DECIDE NOT TO INCLUDE THIS CONDITION IN ITS RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL.

[00:10:01]

THAT IS YOUR RIGHT.

THE PROPOSAL WILL RESULT IN 63 LOTS IN THE R-1 ZONE.

THERE ARE NO CORNER LOTS IN THIS PLAT.

CORNERS ARE CONTAINED WITHIN TRACTS RATHER THAN LOTS.

THERE ARE TWO PRESERVED [INAUDIBLE] IN TRACT C AND THE AREA REFERRED TO AS OVERLOOK PARK AT THE WEST AND EAST CORNERS OF THE SUBDIVISION. STAFF HAS INCLUDED A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE APPLICATION OR THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE PURPOSE OF EACH TRACT ON THE FINAL PLAT.

THIS IS TO ADDRESS WHETHER THE TRACKS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS OPEN SPACE, STORM WATER RETENTION, ETC..

I STATED EARLIER THE SITE IS WITHIN THE RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY.

RESOURCE PROTECTION HAS BEEN AVERAGED ACROSS THE TIMBER SKY DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS TO BE UPDATED AS DEVELOPMENT IS REALIZED.

HOWEVER, THIS PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE REQUIRED 47.5% OF TREE PRESERVATION.

THE PROPOSAL CONFORMS WITH ZONING STANDARDS FOR THE R-1 ZONE WITH DENSITY BETWEEN TWO AND FIVE UNITS PER ACRE.

LOTS ARE DESIGNED TO MEET RESOURCE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS USING BUILDING ENVELOPES.

LOTS MEET MINIMUM SIZE OF 6000 SQUARE FEET, RANGING FROM APPROXIMATELY 8400 SQUARE FEET AND TO 17,950 SQUARE FEET.

LOTS ALSO MEET WIDTH AND DEATH REQUIREMENTS.

NOT ALL LOTS MEET THEIR WIDTH REQUIREMENTS AT THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY LINE.

WHERE THIS IS THE CASE, STAFF IS ALSO INCLUDED A RECOMMENDATION FOR CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE FRONT SETBACK BE APPLIED WHERE THE LOT WIDTH REACHES 60 FEET. THE SETBACKS APPLIED TO CONFORM TO R-1 MINIMUM SETBACKS.

CULTURAL RESOURCE CLEARANCE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE ORIGINAL 2016 APPROVAL.

OPEN SPACE AND AMENITY AREA REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITHIN THE TIMBER SKY DEVELOPMENT.

HOWEVER, THIS SUBDIVISION DOES ALSO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE.

SIDEWALKS ARE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE SUBDIVISION.

THE PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND WILL BE CONFIRMED WITH SEVERAL ENGINEERING PLANS AS THIS IS A SUBDIVISION IN A LARGER SITE. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WAS COMPLETED WITH THE REZONING AND WAS NOT NECESSARY FOR THIS SUBDIVISION.

EIGHT INCH WATER AND SEWER LINES WILL PROVIDE SERVICE FOR EACH LOT.

REGIONAL STORM WATER DETENTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE ENTIRE TIMBER SKY DEVELOPMENT, BUT LID IS INCLUDED IN TRACT OF THE SUBDIVISION.

TO CLARIFY FROM THE STAFF REPORT ON LOT DRAINAGE IS MANAGED BY INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNERS WHILE DRAINAGE AND TRACKS ARE MANAGED BY THE HOA. THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURES AND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS MINIMUM SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE LOT STREET EASEMENT AND BLOCK DESIGN.

STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING CODE, SUBDIVISION CODE AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL ON THIS ITEM WITH THE CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND WE DO HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AS WELL.

OKAY, LET ME THANK YOU, BEN, FOR YOUR REPORT.

I APPRECIATE IT, AND DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS FOR THE CITY? I SEE THAT COMMISSIONER NORTON, YOU HAVE A QUESTION OR A COMMENT? THANK YOU. I WANTED TOUCH ON THE CONDITION WITH REGARD TO THE PATENT EASEMENT.

IN THE LETTER FROM THE LEGAL COUNSEL THAT MENTIONED, OBVIOUSLY THERE HAD BEEN SOME HESITATION FROM THE CITY INITIALLY ABOUT ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT ON THE PORTION THAT DID HAVE THAT OLD PATENT EASEMENT, AND I WAS WONDERING IF I COULD GET SOME CLARIFICATION FROM STAFF OR IF THERE'S ANYBODY FROM CITY LEGAL SIDE OF THINGS TO EXPLAIN HOW AND WHY THE CITY WOULD BE ABLE TO NOT HAVE SUCH A

[00:15:07]

POSITION IF, LET'S SAY, IN THE FUTURE, THIS CAME UP FOR THE HOMES THAT ARE BUILT.

IN THAT EASEMENT AREA, WHETHER IT BE THE GOVERNMENT OR THE STATE OR IN A TITLE, RESEARCH AND TITLE REPORT, IF IT COMES BACK UP, IS THE CITY NOT LIABLE IN SOME WAY BY ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT ON THAT EASEMENT? SO THAT WAS THAT WAS MY CONCERN WITH REGARD TO THAT FOR THE CITY'S POTENTIAL LIABILITY AS WELL AS THE HOMEOWNER.

IS THERE STAFF THAT CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION? I CAN'T ANSWER THE LIABILITY TO THE CITY, BUT WE DO HAVE KEVIN HERE WHO MIGHT BE ABLE TO ENLIGHTEN US ON THAT.

OKAY, THANKS, BEN. KEVIN [INAUDIBLE], DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY.

I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

YOU HAVE THE BEST I CAN.

ALTHOUGH ANY LEGAL ADVICE NEEDS TO BE DONE IN THE E SESSION.

SO IF YOU WANT TO ASK THOSE TYPES OF LEGAL QUESTIONS, YOU'LL NEED TO MOVE TO GO INTO E SESSION AND THEN WE CAN DO IT THERE.

COMMISSIONER MANDINO YEAH, I'D LIKE TO HAVE SOME CLARIFICATION ON IT FROM A LEGAL STANDPOINT.

ALL RIGHT, SO AGAIN, PURSUANT TO ARS 38-43102 IT'S NOTICED THAT MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION CAN GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

SO IF WE CAN GO INTO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, I DON'T KNOW, ALEX, HOW LONG THAT TAKES TO PUT US INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION IF WE CAN DO THAT RIGHT NOW.

I THINK SOMEONE WOULD NEED TO MAKE A MOTION.

YOU COULD VOTE ON IT, AND THEN WE COULD WE COULD DO THAT AND I COULD--OKAY, SO I'LL PROBABLY I'LL END UP MAKING ANOTHER TEAMS MEETING AND SENDING THAT OUT.

SO IF EVERYONE COULD BE, YOU KNOW, REFRESHING THEIR EMAIL AND THEN WE COULD JOIN THAT TEAMS MEETING, EVERYONE ELSE CAN JUST WAIT IN THIS TEAMS MEETING AND WE'LL REJOIN WHEN WE'RE DONE, IF THAT MOTION PASSES.

OKAY, SO I CAN MAKE THE MOTION OR I CAN MAKE THE MOTION.

IF YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, SURE.

I MOVE THAT WE GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR LEGAL ADVICE ON THE MATTER OF THE PATENT EASEMENT WITH REGARD TO THIS PLAT.

PZ 15-00015-24.

THANK YOU. IS THERE A SECOND TO THAT MOTION? COMMISSIONER HARRIS, I SECOND THE MOTION.

ALL RIGHT, SO THERE'S BEEN A MOTION TO MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AND IT'S BEEN SECONDED.

IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? NOT HEARING ANY DISCUSSION.

WE CAN VOTE ON THE MOTION, ALTHOUGH TO MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY AYE.

AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED.

OKAY, THAT MOTION IS PASSED, SO IF YOU WILL BEAR WITH US.

ALEX IS QUICKLY CREATING A SECOND TEAMS MEETING SO THAT WE CAN MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION, AND ALL THOSE WHO ARE HERE AT THE MEETING, GO AHEAD AND STAY ON WHILE WE GET INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

THANK YOU.

THIS IS COMMISSIONER MANDINO AND I SEE WE STILL HAVE SOME PEOPLE COMING BACK INTO THE SESSION, SO I'LL WAIT UNTIL EVERYBODY GETS BACK INTO THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING , AND ALEX, I JUST SEE THAT IT'S BECKY CARDIFF.

THAT'S ON. OH, THERE WE GO.

SO I THINK EVERYBODY IS BACK, AND I'D LIKE TO CONTINUE WITH OUR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING, AND WE

[00:20:01]

HAD THE STAFF HAD REVIEWED PRELIMINARY PLAT PZ 15-00015-24 FOR SIRIUS AT TIMBER SKY, AND I JUST WANTED TO ASK IF ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

SO, YOU KNOW, I DO HAVE A QUESTION MYSELF, AND IT WAS JUST WITHOUT LOOKING HOW MANY HOW MANY LOTS ARE LESS IN THE 60 FOOT LOT WITH AT THE FRONT OF THEIR LOT.

DO YOU KNOW THAT STAFF OR DO YOU WANT ME TO WAIT TO ASK TIMBER SKY IF THEY HAVE A PRESENTATION? I DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC COUNT.

IT IS PRIMARILY THE LOTS AROUND THE CUL DE SAC, AND I BELIEVE THERE'S ONE OR TWO AT THE AT THE CORNER OF THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE LOOP.

OKAY, SO IT'S PROBABLY SIX.

IF I HAD TO GUESS, I CAN'T ACTUALLY SEE THE DIMENSIONS OF MY OWN PRESENTATION RIGHT NOW.

SO IT'S ABOUT SIX.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

DOES ANYBODY ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? HEARING NONE AND SEEING NO HANDS UP.

I WANT TO ASK IF CAPSTONE HOMES HAS A PRESENTATION.

HELLO, THIS IS JOHN SUTHERLAND.

I DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE A PRESENTATION.

I THINK BEN SUMMED IT UP REALLY WELL AND CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE REGARDING THE PATENT EASEMENT.

I JUST WANT TO SAY OUR POSITION IS THAT THE EASEMENT SHOULDN'T BE EVEN SHOWN ON THE PLAT AT ALL.

I'M ASSUMING YOU REVIEWED OUR ATTORNEY'S LETTER ON THAT ISSUE, AND I THINK IT WAS STATED PRETTY WELL THAT THE EASEMENT DOESN'T EXIST ANY LONGER.

SO PUTTING THAT ON THE PLAT WOULD CREATE AN UNDUE BURDEN, LET'S SAY, ON THIS PROPERTY THAT ON OTHER PROPERTIES WHERE THIS PATENT EASEMENT COVERED WITHIN THE CITY THAT WASN'T PLACED ON THERE EITHER.

SO OUR POSITION IS, IS THAT THE EASEMENT DOESN'T EXIST ANYMORE OR THE PATENT, IT'S NOT EVEN AN EASEMENT, I GUESS.

SO THEREFORE IT SHOULDN'T EVEN BE SHOWN.

IT SHOULDN'T EVEN AFFECT THE PROPERTY AT ALL OR THE PARCEL AT ALL.

SO GIVEN THAT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER.

DO COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? AND I'M SORRY IF YOU CAN ANSWER I KNOW BEN THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT SIX PROPERTIES WOULD BE DIDN'T MEET THE 60 FOOT WIDE UNTIL FURTHER IN THEIR LOT IS SIX CORRECT.

JOHN. YOU KNOW.

I'D HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT A LITTLE CLOSER TO GIVE YOU A BETTER ANSWER.

I THINK IT WAS IN THE AREAS THAT BEN MENTIONED AND WHERE YOU SEE THE LOTS THAT, LET'S SAY TAPER AT THE VERY FRONT TO MEET THE CUL DE SAC, BUT THAT YET THERE ARE WIDER AS YOU MOVE AWAY FROM THE CUL DE SAC.

I THINK THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING.

SO. YEAH.

SIX MIGHT BE THE MAXIMUM, I WOULD SAY.

OKAY, AND JUST HEARING THAT, I'M GOING TO ASK AGAIN IF COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

AND IF NOT, I'LL OPEN IT UP TO THE PUBLIC AND SEE IF THE PUBLIC HAS ANY QUESTIONS, AND SEEING NO HANDS RAISED AND HEARING NO ONE.

I'M GOING TO MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE PUBLIC DOES NOT HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

SO IS THERE A MOTION? COMMISSIONER MANDINO I CAN MAKE A MOTION THAT WE FORWARD THE PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PLAT PZ 15-00015-24 SIRIUS AT TIMBER SKY BLOCK FOUR TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL WITH

[00:25:06]

THE CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

IS THERE A SECOND TO THAT MOTION? COMMISSIONER MARTINEZ, I'LL SECOND THE MOTION.

OKAY, SO THERE'S A MOTION ON THE FLOOR AND A SECOND.

IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? OK SEEING NO HANDS RAISED.

I WILL ASK FOR THE CALL.

SORRY. CAN I INTERRUPT? MARIE, IS THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINDINGS ALSO? YES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINDINGS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION.

PLEASE SAY AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED.

THE MOTION CARRIES AND THAT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATIONS, AND JOHN, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS AND THEN THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO OTHER BUSINESS, AND A IT'S A CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION OF THE REGIONAL PLAN AND UPDATE PROCESS,

[A. Continuation of Discussion of the Regional Plan and Update Process STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review the packet from the Joint Work Session/Study Session and complete the digital whiteboard brainstorming prior to the meeting. Discussion and prioritization of feedback is the input sought at this work session.]

AND I WILL OPEN THAT TO STAFF.

THANK YOU, VICE CHAIR MANDINO.

THIS IS SARAH [INAUDIBLE].

I HAVE SENT THE COMMISSIONERS AN EMAIL TO YOUR INBOX THAT INVITES YOU TO CONTRIBUTE AND GET BACK INTO THE GROUP MAP THAT WE WORKED ON AT THE JOINT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING LAST TIME.

AND SO HOPEFULLY EVERYONE IS ABLE TO LOG IN.

I'M SEEING THAT FOLKS HAVEN'T YET, BUT THAT'S OKAY IF YOU GO TO YOUR EMAIL, YOU SHOULD FIND THIS LINK, AND IF NOT, I WILL POST IN THE CHAT A COUPLE OF PEOPLE.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY IS ALSO WORKING ON THIS MAP ON FINISHING THEIR RANKINGS RIGHT NOW, AND A COUPLE OF THEM GOT ASKED TO PUT IN A PASSWORD FOR SOME REASON, WHICH I'VE SUBMITTED A TICKET TO OUR PLATFORM TO TRY AND FIGURE OUT WHY THAT'S HAPPENING.

SO HOPEFULLY IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN TO ANYBODY HERE IF YOU USE THE LINK I SENT TO YOUR EMAIL.

EXCUSE ME, WHEN WAS THAT EMAIL SENT? JUST A COUPLE OF MINUTES AGO.

OKAY, THANK YOU. OKAY, THANK YOU.

YEAH, BOB SENT IT TO BOB THREE EMAIL ADDRESS THAT YOU USED LAST TIME.

THERE WE GO.