[1. CALL TO ORDER NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for discussion and consultation with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).]

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT AT THIS REGULAR MEETING, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY VOTE TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION, WHICH WILL NOT BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR DISCUSSION AND CONSULTATION WITH THE CITY'S ATTORNEYS FOR LEGAL ADVICE ON ANY ITEM LISTED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA.

CAN WE HAVE A ROLL CALL? MAYOR DAGGETT. HERE.

VICE MAYOR ASLAN.

HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER HARRIS.

HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER HOUSE.

HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER MATHEWS.

HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER SWEET.

HERE. THANK YOU.

AND VICE MAYOR, WOULD YOU LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? PLEASE STAND.

COUNCIL MEMBER SWEET.

I WILL DO THE MISSION STATEMENT.

THE MISSION OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF IS TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ALL.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER HOUSE.

OUR LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT.

THANK YOU MAYOR.

THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL HUMBLY ACKNOWLEDGES THE ANCESTRAL HOMELANDS OF THIS AREA'S INDIGENOUS NATIONS AND ORIGINAL STEWARDS.

THESE LANDS, STILL INHABITED BY NATIVE DESCENDANTS, BORDER MOUNTAIN SACRED TO INDIGENOUS PEOPLES.

WE HONOR THEM, THEIR LEGACIES, THEIR TRADITIONS, AND THEIR CONTINUED CONTRIBUTIONS.

WE CELEBRATE THEIR PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS WHO WILL FOREVER KNOW THIS PLACE AS HOME.

[4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public Participation enables the public to address the Council about an item that is not on the agenda. Comments relating to items that are on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed. If you wish to address the Council at tonight's meeting, please complete a comment card and submit it to the recording clerk as soon as possible. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. You may address the Council up to three times throughout the meeting, including comments made during Public Participation. Please limit your remarks to three minutes per item to allow everyone an opportunity to speak. At the discretion of the Chair, ten or more persons present at the meeting and wishing to speak may appoint a representative who may have no more than fifteen minutes to speak. ]

THANK YOU. NOW WE'RE DOWN TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION OCCURS TWICE ON THE AGENDA NOW AND AT THE END.

AND IT ENABLES THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA.

IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT TONIGHT'S MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE A COMMENT CARD AND SUBMIT IT TO THE RECORDING CLERK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

YOUR NAME WILL BE CALLED WHEN IT'S YOUR TURN TO SPEAK, AND YOU MAY ADDRESS THE COUNCIL UP TO THREE TIMES THROUGHOUT THE MEETING, INCLUDING COMMENTS MADE DURING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES AND COUNCIL IS UNABLE TO RESPOND TO YOU DURING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. SO FIRST WE HAVE NADINE HART.

GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MAYOR DAGGETT.

SO I AM SPEAKING REGARDING SOME OF THE ISSUES AND STRUGGLES AS A HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER HOLDER.

I AM ONE OF MANY, BUT THE ONE WHO IS GOING TO KEEP COMING FORTH.

SO ONE THING THAT I HAVE EXPERIENCED IS THE COST OF THE FIRST MONTH'S RENT.

WHEN I MOVED, I HAD WEEKS FROM HOMELESSNESS AND I HAD TO COME UP WITH $4,000 IN CASH.

WHERE IF YOU'RE IN THIS PROGRAM, YOU CAN ONLY HAVE SO MUCH IN YOUR BANK ACCOUNT ANYWAY, AND WAITING IN HOPES OF LAST MONTH'S DEPOSIT, YOU REALLY HAVE TO HAVE THE MONEY.

AND MY DEPOSIT FIVE YEARS AGO WAS A THIRD OF WHAT THE NEW DEPOSIT WAS.

SO HOW DO WE HELP FAMILIES IN THIS HOUSING MARKET WITH THESE VOUCHERS? WHERE ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO GET THE MONEY? ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE'S ALWAYS A DELAY OF INSPECTION FROM ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER.

AND IN MY CASE, I DID REACH OUT REPEATEDLY TO MY CASE MANAGER FOR HELP, AND THE LACK OF RESPONSE OR RESOURCES INDICATED TO ME THAT IT IS NOT WITHIN THE DUTIES OF THE JOB FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY CASE MANAGER I HAVE.

PEOPLE TOLD ME THERE'S RESOURCES TO HELP WITH THESE FUNDS, BUT WHO? WHERE DO I GO? IT'S NOT OUTLINED CLEARLY.

SO YOU'RE BASICALLY LEFT STANDING IN FRONT OF WALMART WITH A SIGN, WHICH IS WHAT I THOUGHT I WOULD HAVE TO DO.

$4,000 CASH IS A LOT FOR ANYBODY TO MAKE THESE TRANSITIONS.

SO WHAT DO YOU DO TO COME UP WITH A FAIR MARKET RENT IN THIS CURRENT SITUATION? PLUS, IN ADDITION, WHEN WE ARE PAYING OUR RENTS, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY COUNTS GROSS VERSUS NET INCOME.

GROSS IS NOT A DEMONSTRATIVE OF WHAT A PERSON BRINGS IN.

SO IF I MAKE $100 AND I NET 70, A THIRD OF MY RENT OUT OF THE 100 IS ABOUT $33.33 FROM THAT NET, I ONLY HAVE ABOUT $36 TO SPEND ON GAS.

AND THE INCREASE IN UTILITY, WHICH HAS GONE DOWN FOR AN ALLOWANCE.

SO WE MAY GET MORE FOR OUR VOUCHER, BUT WE'RE GETTING LESS FOR ELECTRICITY, WHICH GOES UP FOR EVERYBODY.

[00:05:05]

INTERNET, CELLULAR THINGS WHICH ARE NO LONGER OPTIONS IN OUR CURRENT SOCIETY.

SHORT TERM RENTALS.

WHEN I HAD THE DRYER INSTALLED, I WAS ONE OUT OF SEVEN HOUSES.

THE FIRST SEVEN WERE SHORT TERM RENTALS.

THIS IS AFFECTING OUR ABILITY TO RENT HOUSES.

IF WE COULD FIGURE OUT A WAY TO MAYBE ROTATE THESE OUT, GIVE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES INSTEAD OF GIVING $5 MILLION DOLLARS TO A NEW DEVELOPER, TAKING THAT MONEY TO EXISTING HOUSING AND PROVIDING THAT TO LOCAL LANDLORDS TO RENT TO PEOPLE LIKE ME.

THAT IN TURN WILL HELP FUTURE MARKET POSSIBILITIES FOR OTHER PEOPLE.

A LOT BETTER THIS TIME.

THANK YOU. NADINE.

YEAH. THANK YOU, JONATHAN OTERO.

HELLO, COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS JOHNNY.

AM I SPEAKING TOO LOUD? MY NAME IS JOHNNY OTERO AND I'M A PROUD ASPIRING EDUCATOR.

I COME TODAY IN SOLIDARITY WITH MY STUDENTS AND ALSO UNSHELTERED RELATIVES WHO HAVE BEEN IMPACTED BY THIS COUNCIL FOR YEARS, FOR DECADES.

YOU KNOW, EARLIER WE HAVE READ THAT THE MISSION OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF IS TO PROTECT AND ENSURE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ALL.

SO WHY? WHY IS IT LIKE, WHY IS SLEEP BEING CRIMINALIZED IN THIS SACRED LAND? WHY IS BEING UNSHELTERED CRIMINALIZED ON THIS SACRED LAND? WHY PUT OUR MOST VULNERABLE IN HARM'S WAY, ESPECIALLY DURING THE WINTER? YOU KNOW, JUST LAST YEAR, FOUR REPORTED UNSHELTERED RELATIVES LOST THEIR LIFE HERE IN THIS CITY DUE TO THIS COUNCIL'S NEGLIGENCE.

WITH LIMINAL CLOSING DOWN AND THE CAMPING ORDINANCE CONTINUING WHERE OUR UNSHELTERED RELATIVES HAVE NOWHERE TO GO.

AND I ALSO ASK, WHY GIVE A LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT WHEN YOU ALL WILL CONTINUE TO OPPRESS AND CRIMINALIZE UNSHELTERED RELATIVES? I SPEAK ON THIS AS AN ASPIRING EDUCATOR.

I'M A STUDENT, I AM A TEACHER, AND MOST OF ALL, I AM HUMAN.

AND I SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING TO MY STUDENTS.

AND I WANT CHANGE TO HAPPEN.

AND I KNOW CHANGE CAN HAPPEN WITH THIS COUNCIL IN FRONT OF ME.

YOU KNOW, FURTHER ON IN THE AGENDA, WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT THE RENAMING OF THE PEAKS.

VERY GOOD WORK.

LET THIS WORK CONTINUE.

LET THIS WORK CONTINUE WITH OUR UNSHELTERED RELATIVES.

LET THIS WORK CONTINUE WITH OUR UNDOCUMENTED STUDENTS ON CAMPUS AT NAU.

NOW THAT PROP 308 IS PASSED, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE DREAMERS, MORE UNDOCUMENTED STUDENTS.

WE NEED A SANCTUARY CITY.

WE NEED A SANCTUARY CAMPUS.

AND I JUST THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

[A. November Work Anniversaries Recognition of employees celebrating work anniversaries in the month of November]

MOVING DOWN TO NOVEMBER WORK ANNIVERSARIES.

GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, JOANNE KEENE, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER.

AND I'M HERE TONIGHT COVERING FOR SHANNON ANDERSON TO CELEBRATE OUR NOVEMBER WORK ANNIVERSARIES.

PULL UP THE PRESENTATION.

SO WE'RE GOING TO START TODAY BY CELEBRATING OUR ONE YEAR ANNIVERSARIES FOR EMPLOYEES.

WE HAVE TWO SLIDES AND I WILL NOT READ THE NAMES BUT I WILL SCROLL THROUGH THEM.

WE HAVE MANY DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS REPRESENTED AND MANY DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS WHO AGAIN HAVE BEEN WITH THE CITY FOR ONE YEAR.

MOVING FORWARD, I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT BRYAN HAWK, WHO IS CELEBRATING A FIVE YEAR ANNIVERSARY, AND BRYAN IS A LIBRARY SUPERVISOR.

ED SCHENK.

I THINK MANY OF US KNOW ED IS CELEBRATING FIVE YEAR ANNIVERSARY AND ED IS OUR WATER SERVICES SECTION DIRECTOR FOR STORMWATER. JENNIFER MOORE, WHO IS A SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALIST IN OUR HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT.

AND YOU'LL SEE HER WHEN YOU WALK IN TO OUR HR DEPARTMENT.

AND SHE'S RIGHT UP FRONT.

JENNY LYNN IS A COLLECTION SPECIALIST IN OUR MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION, AND SHE IS CELEBRATING HER 15 YEAR ANNIVERSARY WITH THE CITY.

[00:10:04]

AS IS KYLE NELSON, WHO IS A WATER SERVICES OPERATOR.

AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST, I'D LIKE TO RECOGNIZE RON KANWISCHER, WHO IS RETIRING AS AN ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.

AND I'D LIKE TO TURN IT OVER TO STERLING SOLOMON, WHO'S GOING TO GIVE SOME REMARKS ABOUT RON.

THANK YOU JOANNE. MAYOR AND COUNCIL, STERLING SOLOMON, YOUR CITY ATTORNEY.

LAST MONTH, WE BID FAREWELL TO RON KANWISCHER AS HE RETIRED.

HE STARTED HERE AT THE CITY ON OCTOBER 13TH, 2003 AND RETIRED ON OCTOBER 13TH, 2023.

HIS 20 YEAR ANNIVERSARY.

RON CAME TO US FROM THE IT WORLD.

HE WAS SOMEBODY THAT HAD A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF COMPASSION FOR THOSE WITH WHOM HE WORKED IN THE PROSECUTION SECTION.

HE USED VERY OFTEN WHAT WE REFER TO AS A DIVERSION AGREEMENT.

FOR SOMEBODY WITH ANGER MANAGEMENT ISSUES.

HE WOULD SEND THEM TO AN ANGER MANAGEMENT COURSE, AND ONCE THEY COMPLIED, THE CHARGES COULD BE DISMISSED.

HE USED THESE TOOLS VERY EFFECTIVELY TO HELP MANY OF THE MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY, WHETHER IT WAS A CRIME INVOLVING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR A CRIME INVOLVING SUBSTANCE.

RON WAS JUST VERY GOOD AT WHAT HE DID, AND WE WERE VERY SORRY TO SEE HIM GO.

RON IS KIND OF THE STRONG, QUIET, SILENT TYPE.

THEREFORE, WE DON'T HAVE A PICTURE OR A LONG DESCRIPTION WRITTEN UP OF HIM HERE, BUT HE IS VIEWING ONLINE AND I WANT TO THANK YOU, RON, FOR THE TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF EFFORT AND TIME YOU PUT IN HERE AT THE CITY.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, STERLING.

AND THANK YOU, RON.

JUST CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYBODY CELEBRATING THEIR ANNIVERSARIES.

AND CONGRATULATIONS TO RON ON HIS RETIREMENT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

[6. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS]

ALL RIGHT. MOVING DOWN TO COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS.

I WAS GOING TO PICK WHOEVER MADE EYE CONTACT WITH ME FIRST, BUT I'LL GO WITH COUNCIL MEMBER HOUSE.

I KNEW YOU WERE GOING TO PICK WHOEVER MADE EYE CONTACT WITH YOU FIRST, AND I DIDN'T, AND I STILL GOT PICKED.

SO LAST WEEK I WAS AT A HOUSING POLICY CONFERENCE, AND THAT MADE ME MISS THE COMMISSION ON DIVERSITY AWARENESS MEETINGS.

SO MY APOLOGIES TO THAT TEAM, BUT I DID HAVE A CHANCE TO WATCH THE RECORDING AND SAW THAT THEY HAD A ROBUST DISCUSSION, INCLUDING A PRESENTATION BY THE ASSOCIATE VICE PROVOST FOR GLOBAL AFFAIRS AT NAU, CESAR FLORES.

THEY HAD UPDATES ON THE NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH FLAG THAT WAS DEVELOPED BY THE INDIGENOUS COMMISSION AND NOW FLIES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR THIS MONTH.

I'M GOING TO BE REACHING OUT TO NEWLY ELECTED CHAIR CAROLYN KIDD.

CONGRATULATIONS TO HER REGARDING A PRESENTATION SHE GAVE LAST MONTH ON THE PROPOSED UPDATES FOR THE FLAG FOR BLACK HISTORY MONTH. SHE DID A WONDERFUL PRESENTATION WITH MANY OPTIONS, AND WE WERE GOING TO FOLLOW UP ON THAT.

BUT I STILL NEED TO GET A COPY OF THAT PRESENTATION SO THAT WE CAN MOVE FORWARD ON THAT.

BUT HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE A PROPOSAL TO PUT FORWARD BEFORE WE MOVE INTO THAT DISCUSSION FOR 2024.

THE COMMISSION ALSO IS CONTINUING TO SEEK GUIDANCE AND UPDATES ON THE PREVIOUSLY INTRODUCED EQUITABLE RESTROOMS SIGNAGE REQUEST.

SO I KNOW THAT THEY ARE STILL AWAITING SOME UPDATES ON THAT.

BUT OTHER THAN THAT, A LOT OF GOOD INFORMATION OUT OF THAT COMMISSION THIS MONTH.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER SWEET.

THANK YOU MAYOR.

I WILL GIVE YOU EYE CONTACT.

YOU CAN CALL ON ME.

LAST WEEK I ATTENDED THE MOUNTAIN LINE BOARD MEETING AND WE DISCUSSED THE 2024 2025 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES.

WE UPDATED THE 12 TO 18 MONTH WORK PLAN AND RECEIVED A PRETTY GREAT UPDATE ON THE BATTERY ELECTRIC BUS PILOT.

A LOT OF INFORMATION IN THAT THAT I WASN'T EXPECTING.

SO A GOOD CONVERSATION.

AND I ALSO ATTENDED THE WATER COMMISSION MEETING, GOT A BRIEF UPDATE ON THE WATER RATE STUDY THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH RIGHT NOW.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY.

THANK YOU. MAYOR. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO REPORT THIS WEEK.

THANK YOU THOUGH. THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR.

SURE. I'LL JUST MENTION BRIEFLY THERE WAS A TOURISM COMMISSION MEETING.

AGENDA WAS VERY, VERY TYPICAL.

FULL OF GREAT REPORTS FROM DISCOVERED FLAGSTAFF TEAM.

ONE THING THAT REALLY.

STUCK OUT TO ME IS THE AMOUNT OF INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL THAT'S GOING ON BY OUR TEAM MEMBERS AND OUR STAFF IN ORDER TO

[00:15:04]

PROMOTE FLAGSTAFF.

I JUST THINK THAT'S REALLY COOL.

REAL QUICKLY, I ATTENDED THE COSMIC GRAY TUNNEL AT THE SHEEP CROSSING TRAIL DEDICATION CEREMONY.

THAT WAS A LOT OF FUN.

IT WAS A VERY SPIRITED AND JOYFUL AFFAIR AND IT'S A GREAT MURAL.

GO CHECK IT OUT.

AND ALSO, JUST TO MENTION REALLY BRIEFLY, I HAD A PROMISING MEETING WITH THE DARK SKY COALITION.

THERE'S SOME CONVERSATIONS GOING ON ABOUT FORMALIZING THEIR STRUCTURE A LITTLE BIT MORE INTO SOMETHING THAT'S SIMILAR TO WHAT I DO WITH OUR COCONINO PLATEAU WATER ADVISORY PARTNERSHIP THAT MIGHT GIVE ELECTED OFFICIALS HERE AT THE CITY AND AT THE COUNTY AND IN OTHER COMMUNITIES A CHANCE TO ENGAGE AND BE INVOLVED IN THAT.

SO THOSE TALKS ARE ONGOING.

I THINK WOULD BE A REALLY NICE DEVELOPMENT FOR THAT GROUP AND FOR THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THEIR EFFORTS OVER TIME AND EXPANDING DARK SKIES REGIONALLY.

SO I THINK I'LL LEAVE IT THERE.

ONE OTHER THING I MIGHT AS WELL MENTION IS THE INTERPRETIVE DISPLAY THAT WAS UNVEILED AT THE FLAGSTAFF VISITOR CENTER.

THANK YOU COUNCIL MEMBER SWEET.

REALLY NEAT TOUCHSCREEN DISPLAY WITH LOTS OF INTERACTIVE TOOLS AND MATERIALS AND VIDEOS.

AND AGAIN, JUST A FESTIVE FUN MORNING ENGAGEMENT.

A LOT OF NICE RED CARPET RIBBON CUTTING AFFAIRS THIS PAST WEEK.

COUNCIL MEMBER HARRIS.

NOTHING AT THIS TIME.

COUNCIL MEMBER MATTHEWS.

THANK YOU, MAYOR. I TOO WAS AT THE MOUNTAIN LINE BOARD MEETING LAST WEEK, AND WE ALSO HAD A PRESENTATION TO DISCUSS THE FINALIZED 12 TO 18 MONTH WORK PLAN TO CAPTURE SOME OF THE TASKS THAT WERE SUPPORTED BY THE STRATEGIC PLAN WE CAME UP WITH NOT TOO LONG AGO, SOME OF WHICH IS CDL TRAINING AND TESTING FACILITY, COMPLETION OF A MOBILITY STUDY TO IDENTIFY NEW AND CREATIVE TRANSIT OPTIONS.

AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE FIRST RESPONDERS TO PLAN FOR A SAFE, ZERO EMISSIONS BUS TRANSITION, AND THEN ALSO TALK ABOUT DISCUSSIONS ABOUT A TRANSIT TAX IF IT SHOULD BE ON 2024 BALLOT.

BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, AND THE BIGGEST EXCITING NEWS WAS MOUNTAIN LINE WAS AWARDED 12.4 MILLION GRANT MONEY, FEDERAL MONEY FOR BUILDOUT OF SOLAR ON TOP OF THE ROOF OF THE NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AT THE DOWNTOWN CONNECTION CENTER, AND THE FULL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE TWO OF THE DOWNTOWN CONNECTION CENTER, WHERE THE BUSSES STAGE AND THE CIVIC SPACE.

SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT RECEIVING THAT AND MOVING FORWARD WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT.

THANK YOU. NOTHING FOR ME THIS EVENING.

[7. LIQUOR LICENSE PUBLIC HEARINGS Applications under Liquor License Public Hearings may be considered under one public hearing and may be acted upon by one motion unless otherwise requested by Council. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Hold the Public Hearing The City Council has the option to: Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for approval; Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for denial based on the testimony received at the public hearing and/or other factors.]

SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, WHICH IS LIQUOR LICENSE, PUBLIC HEARINGS.

HOW MANY OF THESE DO WE HAVE? JUST THE ONE.

NO, WE HAVE A COUPLE.

BUT FIRST I'M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND PLEASE GO AHEAD.

GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS NICK ALMENDAREZ.

I'M A SERGEANT WITH THE FLAGSTAFF POLICE DEPARTMENT.

BEFORE YOU TO PRESENT TWO LIQUOR LICENSES.

THE FIRST IS FOR OVER EASY.

IT IS A SERIES 12 RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE AND LOCATED AT 501 EAST PICCADILLY BUILDING 101, SUITE 70.

THE APPLICATION WAS FILED BY JEFFREY MILLER, THE AGENT JARED FIELD, THE CONTROLLING PERSON, RYAN FIELD, CONTROLLING PERSON, AND JACOB WHITE, ALSO CONTROLLING PERSON CHRISTOPHER BRICKLEY, WHO WAS A PREMISE MANAGER.

IN OUR INVESTIGATIONS, NO DEROGATORY RECORDS ON THE APPLICANTS WERE DISCOVERED AND THERE WERE NO CURRENT OR HISTORICAL LIQUOR VIOLATIONS FOR THE BUSINESS.

WE FOUND EVIDENCE THE APPLICANTS HAD TAKEN THE MANDATORY LIQUOR LICENSE TRAINING.

AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BUSINESS, WAS INVITED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND IS AVAILABLE VIRTUALLY.

THANK YOU COUNCIL.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR OUR SERGEANT HERE? AND IF NOT, I WILL TAKE A MOTION TO FORWARD THE APPLICATION TO THE STATE.

ACTUALLY, MAYOR, IF YOU COULD ASK IF THERE'S ANY PUBLIC COMMENT, THERE'S NO.

AND THEN IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? NO, THERE IS NO PUBLIC COMMENT.

THANK YOU. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

[00:20:03]

AND NOW I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

I FEEL LIKE WE'RE IN STAR WARS OR SOMETHING, SO I WILL TAKE A MOTION TO FORWARD THE APPLICATION.

OKAY, MAYOR, I'LL MOVE TO FORWARD THE APPLICATION TO THE STATE WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FOR OVER EASY.

THANK YOU. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT.

AND THEN THE OH COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY VICE MAYOR IS STEPPING IN FOR YOU IN THE PUN DEPARTMENT.

ALL RIGHT. THE SECOND LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION.

OKAY. THE SECOND LIQUOR LICENSE IS FOR THE SUNNYSIDE CHEVRON.

THIS IS A SERIES NINE BAR LIQUOR LICENSE AND LOCATED AT 2205 NORTH 4TH STREET.

APPLICATION WAS FILED BY ANTHONY COLSTON, THE AGENT AND CONTROLLING PERSON.

GREGORY MCCABE, THE CONTROLLING PERSON.

IN MY INVESTIGATION, I DISCOVERED NO DEROGATORY RECORDS ON THE APPLICANTS AND NO CURRENT OR HISTORICAL LIQUOR VIOLATIONS ON THE BUSINESS.

I FOUND NO EVIDENCE THE APPLICANTS OR I FOUND EVIDENCE THE APPLICANTS HAD TAKEN THE MANDATORY LIQUOR LICENSE TRAINING.

AS WELL A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BUSINESSES WAS INVITED AND IS AVAILABLE VIRTUALLY IF NEEDED.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO FORWARD THE APPLICATION? ACTUALLY, MAYOR, MY APOLOGIES THAT I CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING PREMATURELY.

YEAH. IF YOU COULD JUST OPEN AND ASK IF THERE'S ANY PUBLIC COMMENT, AND THEN I'D LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

NOW IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

COUNCIL DO I HAVE A MOTION? MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MOVE TO FORWARD THE APPLICATION TO THE STATE WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.

THANK YOU. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

ANY DISCUSSION.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE.

ANY OPPOSED?

[8. CONSENT AGENDA All matters under Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine. Unless a member of City Council expresses a desire at the meeting to remove an item from the Consent Agenda for discussion, the Consent Agenda will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendations listed on the agenda. Unless otherwise indicated, expenditures approved by Council are budgeted items. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve the Consent Agenda as posted.]

ALL RIGHT. WE'RE MOVING DOWN TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

ALL MATTERS UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE ROUTINE.

UNLESS A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL EXPRESSES A DESIRE AT THIS MEETING TO REMOVE AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION, THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION APPROVING THE RECOMMENDATIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA.

UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, EXPENDITURES APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL ARE BUDGETED ITEMS. COUNCIL IS THERE ANY ITEM THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO PULL FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? OKAY, SO THEN I WILL TAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 8, A AND B UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA.

MAYOR. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS POSTED.

THANK YOU. DO I HAVE A SECOND? THANK YOU.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED?

[A. Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2023-25: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, ratifying the grant and reservation of easements; and formally accepting dedications and donations of easements and real property interests; providing for severability, authority for clerical corrections, and establishing an effective date. (Approving receipt/transfer of easements and real property interests) STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read Ordinance No. 2023-25 by title only for the final time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2023-25 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-25]

ALL RIGHT.

MOVING DOWN TO ROUTINE ITEMS. 9A CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-25, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF RATIFYING THE GRANT AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS AND FORMALLY ACCEPTING DEDICATIONS AND DONATIONS OF EASEMENTS OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS.

HELLO. HI.

GOOD AFTERNOON, HONORABLE MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.

I'M CARMEN PRYOR, THE REAL ESTATE SPECIALIST IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

AND THIS AFTERNOON, I'M BEFORE YOU FOR THE SECOND READ OF ORDINANCE 2023-25.

AFTER THE FIRST READ, CLERICAL ERRORS WERE NOTICED AND ARE CORRECTED TO REFLECT ON THE SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 2023-25. THANK YOU.

I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS COUNCIL? I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOMENT, A MOMENT, A MOVEMENT, A MOTION.

[LAUGHTER] I'M ENTERTAINING ALL OF THAT TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-25 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FINAL TIME. MAYOR I'D LIKE TO MOVE TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-25 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FINAL TIME.

THANK YOU. DO I HAVE A SECOND? MAYOR YOU CERTAINLY ARE ENTERTAINING.

I WILL SECOND THE MOTION.

THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. CITY CLERK.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF RATIFYING THE GRANT AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS AND FORMALLY ACCEPTING DEDICATIONS AND DONATIONS OF EASEMENTS AND

[00:25:07]

REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AUTHORITY FOR CLERICAL CORRECTIONS AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THANK YOU. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT? SO MOVED. THANK YOU.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. AYE.

ANY OPPOSED?

[A. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-57 and Ordinance No. 2023-28: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk entitled "PZ-22-00223 - Planned Residential Development" and an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, to modify the existing Planned Residential Development standards. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: At the November 21, 2023, Council Meeting: 1. Read Resolution No. 2023-57 by title only 2. City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2023-57 by title only (if approved above) 3. Read Ordinance No. 2023-28 by title only for the first time 4. City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2023-28 by title only (if approved above) At the December 5, 2023, Council Meeting: 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-57 6. Read Ordinance No. 2023-28 by title only for the final time 7. City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2023-28 by title only (if approved above) 8. Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-28]

ALL RIGHT. WE'RE DOWN TO PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. AND LET'S SEE, WE HAVE A, B, AND C.

THAT ARE THE SAME, ESSENTIALLY IN THE SAME BLOCK.

CORRECT. SO WE COULD TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT ON ALL THREE OF THESE AT ONCE.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

SO I AM GOING TO TAKE 10 A, B AND C TOGETHER.

AND WE WILL TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT ON ALL OF THOSE AT ONCE.

AND PLEASE GO AHEAD.

MAYOR WE'LL JUST NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

[LAUGHTER] I DIDN'T HEAR IT.

I'M VERY SORRY.

NOW I'M IN BIG TROUBLE.

HI. HI.

TIFFANY ANTOL, ZONING CODE MANAGER.

TONIGHT, I AM HERE TO PRESENT THREE ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS.

I WAS HERE JUST A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO HAVING A WORK SESSION WITH YOU ALL.

I HAD FOUR AT THAT TIME, BUT I'VE ONLY GOT THREE TODAY.

THE FIRST ONE UP IS THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

WE HAD A VERY GOOD CONVERSATION AT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THIS IS MUCH LOUDER THAN IT NORMALLY IS.

WE HAD A GREAT CONVERSATION AT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT THEIR PUBLIC HEARING.

WHEN GOING THROUGH THIS TEXT AMENDMENT, THEY HAD ACTUALLY ASKED THAT I LOOK AT.

OKAY THAT I HAD ACTUALLY LOOKED AT RE SORT OF CATEGORIZING OR SEPARATING THE POINT STRUCTURE OUT ON THE PARTICULAR DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT WILL BE NOW REQUIRING WITH THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WHICH I'LL GET TO HERE IN A MINUTE.

AFTER A GOOD CONVERSATION, WE REALIZED THAT THAT PROBABLY WASN'T THE BEST ALTERNATIVE.

THEY APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO ALL BASED ON THE ORIGINAL TEXT AMENDMENT, AND THEY WERE SUPPORTIVE OF THIS AMENDMENT MOVING FORWARD.

WITH THAT WE'VE ALSO TAKEN THIS AMENDMENT TO THE HOUSING COMMISSION AS WELL.

GENERALLY, GOOD FEEDBACK FROM THE HOUSING COMMISSION.

SO FEEL GOOD ABOUT THIS MOVING FORWARD.

I DO HAVE ONE DEVELOPER RIGHT NOW I'M A LITTLE CONCERNED WITH, BUT I'M TRYING TO TALK THEM THROUGH.

I'VE WORKED SEVERAL OF THEIR PROJECTS THROUGH THIS CODE AMENDMENT TO TRY TO SHOW THEM.

I JUST NEED A MINUTE OF THEIR TIME, WHICH I'M HOPING TO GET HERE REAL SOON, AND AND WE'LL GET THEM SET ON THE STRAIGHT PAGE.

SO THIS AMENDMENT BASICALLY CHANGES OUR EXISTING PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

RIGHT NOW, THERE ARE CERTAIN TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO USE THESE STANDARDS.

THIS IS GOING TO CHANGE THAT.

THIS IS 100% AN INCENTIVE PROCESS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

SO YOU CAN EITHER CHOOSE TO USE YOUR UNDERLYING ZONING STANDARDS IF YOU WANT TO DO, SAY, A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN THE MR OR THE HR, OR YOU CAN USE YOUR UNDERLYING ZONING STANDARDS, THE PRD WILL NOW PRIMARILY BE APPLIED TO THE NEW SUBDIVISIONS, WHICH IS BASICALLY ALLOWING A DEVELOPER TO CREATE SMALLER, LOTS DIFFERENT LOT COVERAGES, BUT THEY'LL BE APPLIED TO A WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD IN WHOLE RATHER THAN PIECEMEAL, POTENTIALLY THROUGHOUT A NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO THAT'S THE BIG PRIMARY CHANGE YOU'RE SEEING.

IN ADDITION, AS WE'VE WORKED THROUGH THIS PROCESS, WE TALKED ABOUT THE FACT THAT CIVIC SPACE WAS THIS ADDITIONAL 5% ON TOP OF 15% OPEN SPACE WHEN YOU USE THE PRD, AND THAT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WERE NOW HAVING TO PROVIDE 20%, IN ADDITION TO ALSO DOING RESOURCE PROTECTION AS WELL, WHICH CAN MAKE IT TOUGH TO HIT SOME OF THE MINIMUM DENSITIES WHEN WE'RE SUBDIVIDING LAND.

SO WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH CHANGING CIVIC SPACE TO ONLY APPLY TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

IT IT'LL NO LONGER APPLY TO RESIDENTIAL, BUT THAT 15% WILL STILL BE THERE.

WE DO MODIFY THE USE TABLES, BOTH THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE COMMERCIAL USE TABLES.

THERE'S SOME GENERAL CLEANUP WORK THAT'S HAPPENING IN THESE TABLES.

BASICALLY ANYTHING THAT GETS LISTED, A USE PERMIT AND A PERMITTED USE IN THE SAME LINE GETS BROKEN OUT INTO TWO LINES.

THIS WILL MAKE IT MUCH CLEARER FOR THE PUBLIC AS WELL AS FOR STAFF.

[00:30:03]

IT ALSO TAKES OUT THAT PRD MAKES IT THE SAME.

RIGHT NOW OUR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL TABLES DON'T MATCH HOW WE LIST PRD.

PRD AND THE RESIDENTIAL TABLES IS LISTED IN THE PERMITTED OR USE PERMIT.

BUT THEN IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONES IT'S LISTED AS A USE.

SO JUST SOME GENERAL OVERALL CLEANUP IN ADDITION TO THIS.

AGAIN I GAVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE WHEN WE APPLY IT INSIDE OF AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE REALLY DIFFERENT.

THIS IS GOING TO HELP US KEEP UNIFORMITY FOR DEVELOPMENT IN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS.

AGAIN EXAMPLE.

AND SO AGAIN, CLEANING UP ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT STANDARDS, MAKING IT REALLY CLEAR THAT ONE SINGLE FAMILY UNIT OR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT IS ALLOWED PER LOT OR PARCEL UNLESS APPROVED WITH THE PRD.

SO ANY PLACE WHERE PRD WAS REFERENCED, WE CHANGE IT JUST TO MAKE THE CODE VERY CLEAR AND CONSISTENT.

AGAIN, CHANGING COMMON SPACE, CHANGING THOSE COMMERCIAL USE PROVISIONS.

WE'RE ALSO GETTING RID OF CLUSTER DWELLING, WHICH IS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ONLY NOBODY USES IT BECAUSE IT'S FAR MORE RESTRICTIVE.

SO YAY, WE GET TO TAKE SOMETHING OUT OF THE ZONING CODE, AND I'M A LITTLE EXCITED ABOUT THAT.

SO LET'S GET INTO WHAT THOSE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ARE.

THESE ARE REALLY INCENTIVES, BUT A LOT OF THEM ARE BASED OFF OF BECAUSE OUR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WAS ATTACHED TO OUR FORM BASED CODE STANDARDS.

THEY'RE REALLY TRYING TO REFLECT BACK ON WHAT THOSE STANDARDS WERE AND WHAT WE WERE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH IN THAT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ELEMENT.

IN ADDITION, BECAUSE WE ARE WORKING THROUGH CARBON NEUTRALITY, WE ARE WORKING WITH A HOUSING CRISIS.

THERE ARE ADDITIONAL INCENTIVES APPLIED THAT GO ABOVE AND BEYOND JUST THOSE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN STANDARDS THAT TRY TO ENCOURAGE AND BE MORE INCLUSIVE IN TERMS OF HOUSING AND CARBON NEUTRALITY.

SO THERE ARE INCENTIVES BUILT IN.

IF A PROJECT GOES 100% ELECTRIC, THERE ARE INCENTIVES BUILT IN.

IF A PROJECT IS 100% AFFORDABLE ON THE HOUSING SIDE, WE ADD IN SOME INCENTIVES ABOUT NOT DYSREGULATING ADUS.

SO WE HAVE SOME SUBDIVISIONS, FOR EXAMPLE THROUGH THEIR CCNR'S THAT DON'T ALLOW ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.

THIS WOULD GIVE YOU A POINT TOWARDS PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS.

IF YOU COMMIT TO THAT, IT WILL GIVE YOU SOME POINTS.

IF YOU COMMIT TO ACTUALLY INCLUDING ADUS WITHIN YOUR SUBDIVISION, THIS WILL GIVE YOU POINTS IF YOU DON'T JUST PROVIDE SINGLE FAMILY WITHIN A SUBDIVISION THAT YOU REALLY GET TO THAT MIXED USE THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR THAT GENTLE DENSITY OF DUPLEXES MIXED WITH SINGLE FAMILY, MIXED WITH FOURPLEXES THE WAY THINGS USED TO BE, AND CAN BE VERY BENEFICIAL TO A LOT OF DIFFERENT RESIDENTS WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY.

SO THESE ARE THOSE ELEMENTS, THOSE DESIGN ELEMENTS.

SOME OF THEM ARE MORE TRADITIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS TRYING TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF ALLEYS, TRYING TO GET TO A GRID STREET NETWORK, BUT ALSO TRYING TO WRITE THEM IN A WAY WHERE WE'RE FLEXIBLE ENOUGH. RIGHT? WE KNOW THAT FLAGSTAFF ISN'T FLAT, WE KNOW THAT WE HAVE LOTS OF THINGS TO WORK AROUND, AND OUR GOAL ISN'T TO MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DO THESE THINGS.

OUR GOAL IS TO GET AS CLOSE TO ACHIEVING THEM AS POSSIBLE.

AND WITH THAT, THESE ARE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS THAT NEED TO BE MET.

SO THE FIRST IS ABOUT CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.

AND I LISTED YOU PROBABLY TEN DIFFERENT POLICIES.

THESE POLICIES, THE DESIGN ELEMENTS OF THE PRD ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THESE POLICIES.

SO CONSIDER A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES DONE.

WE'VE DONE THAT, ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT TO BE CLUSTERED IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS.

THAT'S WHAT THE PRD DOES.

SO IN A LOT OF WAYS THIS IS THE ONE TEXT AMENDMENT I THINK I'VE SEEN OR DONE THAT IS REALLY A TRUE REFLECTION OF OUR REGIONAL PLAN AND THE GOALS AND POLICIES CONTAINED IN IT. NEXT UP IS THAT THE AMENDMENT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST, HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE.

AGAIN, THIS IS NOW A COMPLETELY 100% INCENTIVE TOOL.

IT IS CHOSEN BY THE DEVELOPER.

THEY ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED TO USE THIS TOOL.

AND LAST UP, THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS INTERNALLY CONSISTENT.

A LOT OF WORK WAS DONE.

I HOPE AT THE END OF THE DAY IT COMES OUT PERFECT WHEN I SEE IT ON THE OTHER SIDE.

IF IT'S NOT, I'LL BE BACK TO FIX SOMETHING.

BUT THE GOAL HERE WAS TO TRY TO MAKE EVERYTHING AS INTERNALLY CONSISTENT AS POSSIBLE.

AND WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THIS AMENDMENT BE APPROVED.

AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO TRY TO ANSWER THEM.

THANK YOU.

AND YOU JUST SAID THAT PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVED ALL OF THEM? YES. WHICH WAS COUNCIL MEMBER MCCARTHY'S QUESTION.

[00:35:01]

COUNCIL DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR COMMENTS? MAYOR, THIS IS JIM MCCARTHY.

I GUESS I UNDERSTAND THAT P&Z APPROVED IT, BUT WAS IT A UNANIMOUS VOTE OR A 4 3 VOTE OR WHATEVER? I DIDN'T HAVE. IT WAS UNANIMOUS OF ALL THAT WERE PRESENT, AND I BELIEVE IT WAS FIVE ZERO.

TIFFANY I THANK YOU.

AND MAYOR THANK YOU.

ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. AND I DON'T SEE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON ANY OF THESE ITEMS. DO YOU WANT ME TO COVER THE LAST TWO REALLY QUICKLY? YES. WOULD YOU PLEASE.

DO THEM IN A SEPARATE PRESENTATION? SO I APOLOGIZE. BUT JUST REALLY QUICKLY IN THE NEXT STEP IS MEETING FACILITIES.

AND WE ARE CREATING TWO DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS HERE.

RIGHT NOW MEETING FACILITIES IS ONE DEFINITION.

IT BASICALLY IS COMBINING A COMMERCIAL AND A NON COMMERCIAL USE TOGETHER, WHICH CAN BE A LITTLE FRUSTRATING AND CONFUSING FOR ALL THAT WORK ON THE CODE.

THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT CAME UP WHEN WE WERE WORKING ON THE HOSPITAL, AND THEY WERE LOOKING AT A CONVENTION CENTER, AND WE FOUND THAT WE HAD NO USE IN THE CODE TO INCLUDE A CONVENTION CENTER, AND WE THOUGHT THAT WAS AWKWARD AND WEIRD.

SO THIS AMENDMENT IS INTENDED PURPOSE IS TO REALLY CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT IS REALLY A NEIGHBORHOOD FACILITY AND WHAT IS REALLY A COMMERCIAL FACILITY.

SO I WILL AGAIN, THE THE WHOLE POINT OF THESE POLICIES SUPPORT THE PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORHOODS, WHICH IS A GOOD GOAL TO HAVE HERE AND WILL HELP US SEPARATE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE COMMERCIAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD FACILITIES.

AGAIN, NOT ANTICIPATED TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST.

AND AGAIN, INTERNALLY CONSISTENT.

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

AND I HAVE ONE LAST ONE FOR YOU.

AND THAT IS CHANGING THE MANUFACTURED HOME LOT STANDARDS.

I THINK I PROBABLY GOT THE MOST AMOUNT OF POSITIVE FEEDBACK ON THIS PARTICULAR AMENDMENT, WHICH IS GREAT.

I THOUGHT IT WAS TINY AND SMALL AND IRRELEVANT, BUT GOT LOTS OF GREAT FEEDBACK.

SO THE ZONING CODE CURRENTLY REQUIRES A MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE OF FIVE ACRES IN THE MH ZONE, WHEN CLEARLY WE HAVE SUBDIVISIONS THAT WHERE LOTS ARE NOT FIVE ACRES.

SO WE'RE GOING BACK TO WHAT OUR STANDARDS WERE UNDER THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

I THINK THIS WAS HONESTLY JUST AN ERROR FROM WAY BACK WHEN, BUT WILL MAKE IT EASIER TO PUT INFILL IN SOME OF THESE EXISTING MANUFACTURED HOME LOT ZONED AREAS. SO THAT'S THE FULL INTENTION.

IN ADDITION, WE'RE REMOVING THAT FIVE ACRE MINIMUM FOR A MANUFACTURED HOME PARK, WHICH IS WHERE THAT FIVE ACRES COMES FROM, BECAUSE OUR MOST RECENT ONE WAS ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED ON A TWO AND A HALF ACRE PARK.

SO IT'S VERY FEASIBLE.

DENSITY IS JUST SET BY YOUR NUMBER OF UNITS, THE SAME AS A MULTI FAMILY HOME PROJECT WOULD BE.

AND AGAIN POLICIES SUPPORTING HOUSING AND INFILL FROM OUR REGIONAL PLAN NOT ANTICIPATED TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST, HEALTH, SAFETY OR CONVENIENCE AND INTERNALLY CONSISTENT AS WELL.

AND COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THAT ONE AS WELL.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON ANY OF THOSE? WHY DON'T YOU GO AHEAD AND DO D? D IS ACTUALLY NOT MINE.

OH OKAY.

SO I WAS CORRECT THE FIRST TIME A, B AND C ANY QUESTIONS COUNCIL? COMMENTS. STILL NO PUBLIC COMMENT.

ALL RIGHT. SO.

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-57 BY TITLE ONLY.

SORRY MAYOR, BECAUSE WE ARE DOING A, B AND C AS A BLOCK WE NEED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THAT BEFORE WE HAVE THE MOTION, AND THEN WE'LL OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING FOR D SEPARATELY. PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED.

AND THEN. THANK YOU. YOU BET.

SEEING NO PUBLIC COMMENT I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEMS A, B AND C, AND WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-57 BY TITLE ONLY.

SO MOVED. THANK YOU.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE.

CITY CLERK.

A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED PZ-22-00223- PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THANK YOU. CAN I GET A MOTION TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-28 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

SO MOVED. THANK YOU.

DO HAVE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND.

THANK YOU. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?

[00:40:02]

AYE. AYE AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE TITLE TEN FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE.

BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED PZ-22-00223- PLAN DEVELOPMENTAL.

EXCUSE ME. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THANK YOU.

NOW, CAN I GET A MOTION TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-54 BY TITLE ONLY.

MAYOR I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE OR TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-54 BY TITLE ONLY.

CAN I GET A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE AYE AYE. ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED PZ-2300135- MEETING FACILITIES, NEIGHBORHOOD AND REGIONAL.

THANK YOU.

CAN I GET A MOTION TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-26 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

SO MOVED.

CAN I GET A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE TITLE 10 FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED PZ-23-00135- MEETING FACILITIES, NEIGHBORHOOD AND REGIONAL, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THANK YOU.

CAN I GET A MOTION TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-56 BY TITLE ONLY.

SO MOVED. CAN I GET A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED PZ-23-00137- MANUFACTURED HOME MH ZONE LOT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

THANK YOU. CAN I GET A MOTION TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-27 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

SO MOVE. CAN I GET A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. AYE AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE TITLE TEN, FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED PZ-23-00137- MANUFACTURED HOME MH ZONE LOT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

[D. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-58 and Ordinance No. 2023-29: A resolution of the Flagstaff City Council declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk and entitled "PZ-23-00130 Updates to Zoning Code - Open Space Terminology" and an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, by adopting by reference that certain document entitled "PZ-23-00130 Updates to Zoning Code - Open Space Terminology" STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: At the November 21, 2023, Council Meeting: 1. Read Resolution No. 2023-58 by title only 2. City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2023-58 by title only (if approved above) 3. Read Ordinance No. 2023-29 by title only for the first time 4. City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2023-29 by title only (if approved above) At the December 5, 2023, Council Meeting: 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-58 6. Read Ordinance No. 2023-29 by title only for the final time 7. City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2023-29 by title only (if approved above) 8. Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-29 ]

THANK YOU. NOW I'M OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM NUMBER D, CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-58.

AND ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-29.

PLEASE. THANK YOU.

MAYOR, VICE MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

GOOD EVENING, BETHAN HENG I'M ONE OF THE PLANNERS WITH THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

TONIGHT, THE ITEM BEFORE YOU FOR THE FIRST READ PUBLIC HEARING IS THE OPEN SPACE TERMINOLOGY TEXT AMENDMENT.

WITH THAT, WE'LL DIVE INTO THE PRESENTATION.

SO VERY QUICKLY AN OVERVIEW OF WHY YOU'RE SEEING THIS TEXT AMENDMENT TONIGHT.

SO CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE, WE HAVE THREE TERMS THAT REFER TO OPEN SPACE.

SO THOSE THREE TERMS ARE OPEN SPACE, COMMON OPEN SPACE, AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.

NOW HERE'S WHERE THE ISSUE LIES WITHIN THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE THOSE THREE TERMS ARE USED INTERCHANGEABLY AS OPEN SPACE.

AND THIS IS A POTENTIAL CAUSE FOR CONFUSION AND HAS BEEN A POTENTIAL CAUSE FOR CONFUSION FOR PLANNERS AS WELL AS PARTNERS AS WELL AS OTHER PEOPLE WORKING WITH THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE, BECAUSE EACH OF THOSE THREE TERMS MEAN VERY DIFFERENT THINGS.

COMMON OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ARE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, WHILE OPEN SPACE REFERS TO WHAT WE USUALLY THINK OF WHEN WE THINK OF OPEN SPACE.

SO TONIGHT THIS OPEN SPACE TERMINOLOGY TEXT AMENDMENT IS PROPOSING TWO THINGS.

WE'RE GOING TO MODIFY EXISTING TERMINOLOGY.

AND WE'RE TWEAKING THE DEFINITIONS A LITTLE BIT TOO.

AND I'LL GO INTO MORE DETAIL IN THE NEXT SLIDE.

BUT FIRSTLY COMMON OPEN SPACE IS GOING TO BE CHANGING TO COMMON SPACE.

AND THEN PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS GOING TO BE CHANGING TO PRIVATE SPACE ONCE THOSE TWO TERMS HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED AND THEN AS I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY IN THE NEXT SLIDE, I'LL GO INTO HOW THE DEFINITIONS ARE BEING TWEAKED.

[00:45:02]

WE'LL GO INTO THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE AND UPDATE THE TERMINOLOGY THROUGHOUT.

SO, AS PROMISED, HERE ON THE NEXT SLIDE IS HOW WE'RE TWEAKING THOSE TWO DEFINITIONS.

SO COMMON OPEN SPACE IS CHANGING TO COMMON SPACE.

AND THEN PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS CHANGING TO PRIVATE SPACE.

AND THEN I HAVE HERE BOLDED IN YELLOW THE TWEAKS THAT WE'RE ADDING TO THE TWO DEFINITIONS.

SO AGAIN THESE TWO DEFINITIONS ARE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

AND THE TWEAKS THERE CLARIFY THAT THEY ARE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

SO BEFORE YOU IS A TABLE THAT BREAKS DOWN EACH OF THE THREE CURRENT DEFINITIONS, HOW IT'S BROKEN DOWN, I WILL CLARIFY, IS FROM THE CURRENT DEFINITIONS, IT'S NOT PULLING FROM THE NEW DEFINITION THAT WE'RE POSING.

SO WITH THAT, IN TERMS OF AREA SPECIFICATION, OPEN SPACE REFERS TO UNDEVELOPED SPACE OR AREA.

AND THEN COMMON OPEN SPACE IS OPEN SPACE WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT.

AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS OPEN SPACE WITH EACH UNIT.

AGAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

THE PURPOSE FOR OPEN SPACE IS TO MAINTAIN OR ENHANCE THE CONSERVATION OF NATURAL OR SCENIC RESOURCES.

AGAIN, WHAT WE TYPICALLY THINK OF WHEN WE REFER TO OPEN SPACE AND THEN COMMON OPEN SPACE IS FOR THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF ALL OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS THE OPEN SPACE THAT'S DESIGNATED FOR PERSONAL USE.

AND IT GOES ON TO LIST IN THE DEFINITION EXAMPLES OF THAT.

NOW IN TERMS OF PURVIEW, OPEN SPACE FALLS TO PROSE AND THEN COMMON OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE BEING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD.

THAT FALLS TO PLANNING AND ZONING.

SO IN THE NEXT FEW SLIDES, I HAVE SOME VISUAL EXAMPLES OF EACH OF THE THREE TERMS, JUST TO FAMILIARIZE YOU AS COUNCIL ON HOW THESE TERMS DIFFER.

AGAIN, THESE DEFINITIONS ON SCREEN ARE PULLING FROM THE CURRENT DEFINITIONS IN THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE.

SO ON SCREEN COMMON OPEN SPACE, IT'S WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT AND IT'S SHARED BY ALL OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS.

AND EXAMPLES ON SCREEN ARE PRESIDIO IN THE PINES AND BUTTERFIELD APARTMENTS ON SOLIERE AVENUE.

SO FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, IT'S PRIVATE SPACE DESIGNATED FOR EACH UNIT OR LOT.

AND ON SCREEN HAS BEEN PLACED AT SAWMILL.

SO THE BALCONIES THERE ARE PRIVATE SPACE REQUIRED FOR EACH UNIT.

AND ANOTHER EXAMPLE I DON'T HAVE ON SCREEN TODAY ARE LOTS WITHIN A SUBDIVISION.

USUALLY WHAT'S COMMON IS EACH LOT WILL HAVE A PRIVATE YARD AREA THAT'S CONSIDERED PRIVATE SPACE.

AND THEN LASTLY OPEN SPACE.

AGAIN, THIS IS WHAT WE PICTURE.

IT'S GREAT NATURAL SCENIC BEAUTY.

REALLY WHAT THE PURPOSE OF THAT IS FOR IS TO MAINTAIN OR ENHANCE THE CONSERVATION OF NATURAL OR SCENIC RESOURCES.

AND WE HAVE OBSERVATORY MESA ON SCREEN AS WELL AS PICTURE CANYON.

SO IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A TEXT AMENDMENT, THREE FINDINGS NEED TO BE MET.

THE FIRST OF WHICH IS THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH AND CONFORMS TO THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND ANY APPLICABLE SPECIFIC PLAN.

THE SECOND IS THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST, HEALTH, SAFETY, CONVENIENCE OR WELFARE OF THE CITY.

AND THIRD, AND LASTLY, THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS INTERNALLY CONSISTENT WITH OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE.

SO DIVING INTO THE FINDINGS.

FOR FINDING NUMBER ONE, THIS TEXT AMENDMENT IS MOSTLY CLERICAL IN NATURE.

AGAIN, WE'RE ENSURING CONSISTENCY THROUGHOUT THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE.

SO WHILE THE GENERAL PLAN HAS A SECTION DESIGNATED TO OPEN SPACE, THIS TEXT AMENDMENT IS NOT EXACTLY ENACTING ANYTHING FROM THAT SECTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN.

IT'S CLERICAL IN NATURE.

AND SO THIS FINDING DOES NOT APPLY.

FOR THE SECOND FINDING.

THE AMENDMENT PROVISIONS ARE NOT ANTICIPATED TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST, HEALTH, SAFETY, CONVENIENCE OR WELFARE OF THE CITY.

SO THIS FINDING IS BEING MET.

AND THIRDLY THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS INTERNALLY CONSISTENT WITH OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE.

AGAIN, AS CLERICAL IN NATURE, WE'RE ENSURING CONSISTENCY WITH HOW THESE THREE TERMS ARE BEING USED THROUGHOUT THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE.

AND SO THIS FINDING IS BEING MET.

SO BECAUSE THIS TERM, THIS TEXT AMENDMENT HAS TO DO WITH OPEN SPACE IT WAS BROUGHT TO PROSE.

SO IT WAS BROUGHT TO PROSE THE FIRST TIME ON JUNE 26TH.

AND THEN ON SEPTEMBER 25TH, IT WAS BROUGHT AGAIN AT THE SECOND MEETING.

PROSE ACTUALLY RESPONDED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE FOR US TO ADD A NEW TERM TO THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE, AND THAT TERM IS LEGALLY DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE.

[00:50:05]

THE THOUGHT PROCESS BEHIND THIS REQUEST WAS THAT THEY WANTED TO ENSURE THAT OPEN SPACE WOULD RETAIN, WOULD BE RETAINED AS OPEN SPACE, IT WOULD BE UNTOUCHED, AND IT WOULD BE PRESERVED.

BUT STAFF FEELS THAT BECAUSE WITH THE CHANGES THAT WE'RE MAKING TO COMMON SPACE, OR COMMON OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, AND CLARIFYING THAT THOSE TWO TERMS ARE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, WE'RE SEPARATING THEM FROM OPEN SPACE.

AND WE'RE MEETING THIS NEED HERE.

SO AGAIN, THIS TEXT AMENDMENT WAS BROUGHT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR WORK SESSION ON OCTOBER 11TH, AND THEN CAME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 25TH. AND AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VOTED UNANIMOUSLY IN FAVOR OF THE TEXT AMENDMENT.

SO TO DATE, STAFF HAS RECEIVED ONE PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THIS TEXT AMENDMENT.

THAT EMAIL IS ATTACHED TO YOUR PACKET FOR THIS ITEM, AND THEN ALSO STAFF ALSO HELD AN OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS THE TEXT AMENDMENT ON OCTOBER 19TH, 2023, WITH NO OPPOSITION FROM THE PUBLIC.

AND SO WITH THAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FORWARDS A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT.

THANK YOU. AND IT'S NICE TO MEET YOU.

NICE TO MEET YOU TOO. COUNCIL DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE I TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT? THIS IS JIM MCCARTHY.

HI, JIM. SHE COVERED IN GREAT DETAIL WHAT THE EXISTING DEFINITIONS ARE.

COULD YOU REVIEW WHAT THE PROPOSED DEFINITIONS WOULD BE AGAIN? YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. I DID READ THE PACKET, BUT THAT WAS A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO.

ABSOLUTELY. OH, OKAY.

THERE WE GO.

I GUESS MY COMMENT IS THAT IT SAYS PRIVATE SPACE OR IT SAYS COMMON SPACE, BUT IT DOESN'T REALLY TELL WHAT IT IS.

YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IT'S, OPEN SPACE OF A PARTICULAR TYPE OF TWO PARTICULAR TYPES, BUT IT DOESN'T REALLY DEFINE W HAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.

COMMON SPACE, PRIVATE SPACE.

THOSE TERMS ARE KIND OF NEBULOUS.

GUESS THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THE DEFINITION, RIGHT? AND IF I MAY SPEAK TO THAT.

SO FOR COMMON OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE DEFINITION, IT REFERS TO THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF ALL OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS, SO THE IDEA OF IT'S SHARED.

FOR PRIVATE SPACE, IT GOES INTO DETAIL ABOUT HOW A PRIVATE SPACE MAY BE PROVIDED TO EACH UNIT OR LOT WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT. I THINK WHAT MIGHT HELP TOO IS ALSO THE CONTEXT FOR THESE TWO TERMS. SO USUALLY WE FIND COMMON SPACE OR COMMON OPEN SPACE AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS, AS WELL AS PRIVATE OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE IN EACH OF IN SOME OF THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.

AND SO WITHIN THOSE ZONING DISTRICTS, FOR EXAMPLE, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, IT WILL ASK FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS.

AND THAT'S WHEN YOU WILL FIND COMMON OPEN SPACE.

15% OF THE DEVELOPMENT NEEDS TO BE ALLOCATED TO COMMON OPEN SPACE.

AND THEN WE WOULD APPLY WHAT IT'S ASKING FOR BY REFERRING TO THE DEFINITION.

DOES THAT HELP CLARIFY YOUR QUESTION.

YEAH. SO IF YOU READ THE DEFINITION IT'S CLEAR.

I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THAT.

BUT THE TERM ITSELF IS KIND OF AMBIGUOUS.

SO COMMON SPACE.

OH, SORRY. I DIDN'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT YOU THERE.

GO AHEAD. I HAVE AN EXAMPLE ON SCREEN ON A SECTION OF THE CODE THAT IS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE.

SO THIS FALLS UNDERNEATH MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AS WELL AS HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE.

AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, IT REFERS TO COMMON OPEN SPACE.

AND AGAIN THIS IS BEFORE THE NEW TERMINOLOGY HAS BEEN APPLIED.

BUT THIS IS A.

COULD YOU EXPAND THAT? MAKE IT LARGER? YES.

IT'S HARD TO READ.

OKAY. YES. ABSOLUTELY.

LET ME SCROLL OVER TO THAT SLIDE.

BUT AGAIN UNDER MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS, PART OF FLAGSTAFF'S VALUES IS TO BE ABLE TO INCLUDE SHARED SPACES, AS WELL AS TO BE ABLE TO INCORPORATE SOME ELEMENT OF OPEN SPACE INTO A DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO THIS SECTION OF THAT CODE REFERS TO THAT SPECIFICALLY.

[00:55:03]

SO IF WE'RE READING THROUGH THE TABLE HERE, IT'S ASKING FOR THAT SORT OF ELEMENT TO BE INCORPORATED INTO A DEVELOPMENT.

BUT IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS EXAMPLE HERE, AS WE'RE READING THROUGH, THE WAY THAT OPEN SPACE IS BEING REFERRED TO GOES FROM COMMON OPEN SPACE, AND THEN IT GIVES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMON OPEN SPACE, AND THEN IT FLITS OVER TO PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, WHICH IN THIS CASE IT VERY WELL IS REFERRING TO PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.

NOTE HERE IT REFERS TO OPEN SPACE.

AND SO THERE'S A LACK OF CONSISTENCY ON HOW THESE TERMS ARE BEING USED.

OKAY, I'M OKAY FOR NOW.

I'LL PROBABLY STUDY IT IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL BEFORE THE SECOND READ.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU MAYOR.

THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT.

DO WE STILL HAVE OUR ONLINE PUBLIC COMMENT.

MAYOR. SHE HAS RETRACTED HER NEED TO SPEAK.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

SEEING NO QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND GET BACK TO THE AGENDA.

LET ME SEE. OKAY.

DO I HAVE A MOTION TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-58 BY TITLE ONLY.

I MOVE THAT WE CONSIDER AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 2023-58 AND ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-29. SO WE DO HAVE TO TAKE THEM SEPARATELY BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO BE READ SEPARATELY.

VERY GOOD. THANK YOU MAYOR.

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-58.

READ RESOLUTION.

NOT ADOPT. I RETRACT THAT.

AND, MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MOVE TO READ RESOLUTION 2023-58 BY TITLE ONLY.

THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

ANY DISCUSSION.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED PZ-23-00130 UPDATES TO ZONING CODE-OPEN SPACE TERMINOLOGY.

AND CAN I GET A MOTION TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-29 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

MAYOR, I MOVE TO READ ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-29 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE TITLE 10 FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE.

BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED PZ-23-00130.

UPDATES TO ZONING CODE-OPEN SPACE TERMINOLOGY PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES.

SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

[INAUDIBLE]. THANK YOU STAFF.

ALL RIGHT. MOVING DOWN TO ITEM NUMBER 11 ON OUR REGULAR AGENDA.

[A. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-59: Intergovernmental Agreement between Coconino County Flood Control District and the City of Flagstaff for License to Use City Property STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Read Resolution No. 2023-59 by title only City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2023-59 by title only (if approved above) Adopt Resolution No. 2023-59]

ITEM NUMBER 8A CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-59, WHICH IS THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN COCONINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR LICENSE TO USE CITY PROPERTY.

GOOD EVENING MAYOR, VICE MAYOR AND COUNCIL SCOTT OVERTON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.

I'M HERE THIS EVENING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON AN IGA THAT WE HAVE PUT FORWARD JUST ABOUT A MONTH AGO, MAYBE SIX WEEKS AGO.

COCONINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REACHED OUT WITH A MUTUAL AID REQUEST TO UTILIZE SOME CITY PROPERTY BEING LOCATED AT THE CINDER LAKE LANDFILL, AND THIS PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS A SMALL SEGMENT OF THE OVERALL LANDFILL FOOTPRINT THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE SOME PIPE STORAGE AND SOME PIPE FABRICATION FOR THE UPCOMING PIPELINE EAST MITIGATION PROJECTS.

SO WE WERE ABLE TO SUPPORT THIS REQUEST.

CRAFTED AN IGA.

YOU HAVE A FEW EXHIBITS WITHIN YOUR COUNCIL PACKET, AND WE'RE HAPPY TO SAY WE'VE COME TO AGREEMENT WITH COCONINO COUNTY FOR THEM TO UTILIZE THIS PROPERTY WITHOUT INTERFERENCE TO ANY NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES OR OUR LANDFILL OPERATIONS.

AND WE'RE, IN ALL HONESTY, HAPPY TO HELP SUPPORT THE CAUSE ON PIPELINE EAST AND SEE THIS AS A GOOD PARTNERSHIP WITH OUR FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT.

SO WITH THAT, WE'D REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THE IGA, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE THIS EVENING.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

[01:00:03]

ALL RIGHT. I DON'T SEE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT, SO I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-59 BY TITLE ONLY. I MOVE TO READ RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-59 BY TITLE ONLY.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. AYE.

AYE. ANY OPPOSED? CITY CLERK.

A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN COCONINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF TO ALLOW THE DISTRICT TO USE CITY PROPERTY AT CINDER LAKE LANDFILL FOR A PIPE FABRICATION FACILITY.

DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT? MAYOR I'LL MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-59.

THANK YOU. CAN I GET A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? GREAT. THANK YOU, MR. OVERTON. DOWN TO B, CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ADJUSTMENTS OF PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

[B. Consideration and Approval of Adjustments of Property Development Standards: Request by Roers Company, applicant for VP66 & Woody Mountain LLC, property owner, to approve adjustments to property development standards for a 100% affordable housing development located at 2292 S Alvan Clark Blvd (APN 112-01-156). STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the modifications requested as presented, with the following conditions: Before Civil Plan approval, staff will be provided with a revised site plan showing the final location of solar parking canopies, column locations, and layout of parking spaces. A final landscape plan showing the layout of the parking peninsulas and the quantities and locations of landscape material be provided to staff as part of the Civil Plan Set submittal.]

REQUEST BY ROERS COMPANY, APPLICANT FOR VP 66 AND WOODY MOUNTAIN LLC, PROPERTY OWNER, TO APPROVE ADJUSTMENTS TO PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A 100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 2292 SOUTH ALVAN CLARK BOULEVARD.

HELLO AND WELCOME.

HELLO. THIS MEETING IS MOVING REALLY FAST, SO I HAD TO PULL MY PRESENTATION UP.

HERE WE GO.

ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING.

I'M . ALAXANDRA PUCCIARELLI CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER.

I'M HERE TO PRESENT THE WOODY MOUNTAIN APARTMENTS ADJUSTMENT OF PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

THIS IS A REQUEST BY ROERS COMPANY TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS.

SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR FOUR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CITY'S ZONING CODE.

THE FIRST IS A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE DEPTH OF THE REQUIRED JOGS IN THE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS.

THE CODE RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT ANY WALL OF A BUILDING OVER 75FT LONG HAS TO BE BROKEN UP, JOG AT LEAST 20% OF THE HEIGHT OF THAT WALL.

THE NEXT REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED GARAGE DOOR RECESS DEPTH FROM 18IN, WHICH IS WHAT CODE REQUIRES TO 12IN.