Jun 26, 2024 Planning and Zoning

I'M BACKING AWAY FROM IT.

[00:00:03]

[1. CALL TO ORDER NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the Commission and to the general public that, at this work session, the Commission may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the Commission’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).]

AND WE WOULD DO THAT FOR LEGAL ADVICE AND DISCUSSION WITH THE COMMISSION'S ATTORNEY AND ANY ITEM LISTED ON THE ON THIS AGENDA PURSUANT TO ARS 38-4 31.0 3A3 AND WE'LL MOVE INTO ROLL CALL.

[2. ROLL CALL NOTE: One or more Commission Members may be in attendance telephonically or by other technological means. CAROLE MANDINO, CHAIR BOB HARRIS, III CJ LUCKE MARY NORTON, VICE CHAIR IAN SHARP MEGAN WELLER ]

BOB HARRIS.

WE'LL SEE IF HE SHOWS UP LATER.

C.J. SO, C.J.

LUKEY, THERE.

I TURNED IT OFF. I TURNED IT BACK ON.

IT'S BETTER, IS EXCUSED.

SHE'S TRAVELING, MARY NORTON, IAN SHARP, MEGAN WELLER.

TEST. SO, AT THIS TIME.

THIS IS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.

AT THIS TIME, ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY SUBJECT WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTION THAT IS NOT SCHEDULED BEFORE THE COMMISSION TODAY DUE TO OPEN MEETING LAWS.

THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR ACT ON ITEMS PRESENTED DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THE ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE WAIT FOR ME TO CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AT THE TIME THAT THE ITEM IS HEARD.

AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO MOVE INTO APPROVAL.

OH, DOES ANYBODY HAVE I'M SORRY.

DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT AT THIS TIME? THAT WOULD BE NICE TO ASK.

HEARING NONE.

WE'LL GO INTO THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING FOR WEDNESDAY, JUNE 12TH, 2024.

[4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the minutes from the regular meeting on Wednesday, June 12, 2024.]

NO, YOU NEED TO MAKE A.

SO, YOU DON'T NEED TO MOVE.

YOU NEED TO SAY WHAT THE AMENDMENT IS.

SO, WE NEED AN AMENDMENT TO THE MINUTES WITH REGARD TO FIVE A, THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CONDITIONAL USE.

THERE HAD BEEN A MOTION TO APPROVE IT.

THAT WAS MADE BY CJ LUKEY AND SECONDED BY MEGAN WELLER.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FINAL VOTE WAS.

THE VOTE WAS 5 TO 0, 5 TO 0, 6 TO 0.

SORRY. SO, WE HAD ALL COMMISSIONERS HERE LAST TIME.

SO, THERE'S BEEN A AMENDMENT TO THE MINUTES.

SO NOW WE CAN MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS A, AS AMENDED, UNLESS ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANOTHER AMENDMENT.

THE WORK.

THERE IT GOES. I APPROVE.

I MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES, AS AMENDED.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SO, IT'S BEEN APPROVED BY IAN AND SECONDED BY MEGAN TO APPROVE THE MINUTES, AS AMENDED FOR JUNE 12TH, 2024.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. ANY OBJECTIONS? HEARING NONE, THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED, AS AMENDED.

WE'LL MOVE INTO THE PUBLIC HEARING.

[A. PZ-24-00046: MOUNTAIN VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH A Conditional Use Permit request from Mountain View Baptist Church, for a Place of Worship church addition with more than 250 seats at 2150 E Linda Vista Dr (APN 108-01-001V), within the Rural Residential (RR) zone. This application proposes to develop a 6,674 square foot addition to a place of worship which includes a sanctuary, a library, office spaces, and meeting rooms on a 2.99-acre site. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff believes that the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request is in substantial conformance with the required findings and recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve PZ-24-00046, subject to the following conditions: 1. The development of the site shall substantially conform to the plans as presented with the Conditional Use Permit application. ]

ALL RIGHT.

AM I GOOD TO GO? OKAY. COOL.

GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. CHAIR, VICE CHAIR AND COMMISSION.

BETHAN HANGEM. ONE OF THE PLANNERS WITH THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF.

TONIGHT. THE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH WITH THEIR NEW BUILDING ADDITION.

THE REASON WHY YOU'RE SEEING THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST IS BECAUSE WITHIN THEIR NEW BUILDING ADDITION, THEY'RE PROPOSING FOR A NEW PLACE OF WORSHIP WITH MORE THAN 250

[00:05:03]

THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT.

SO A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTED BY THAT RED STAR ON THE MAP IN FRONT OF YOU, IS LOCATED AT 2150 EAST LINDA VISTA DRIVE, AND AS MENTIONED, THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING ADDITION AND WITHIN THE BUILDING ADDITION.

WHAT'S TRIGGERING THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TONIGHT IS THAT PLACE OF WORSHIP WITH MORE THAN 250 SEATS.

SO AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED RURAL RESIDENTIAL.

NOW A PLACE OF WORSHIP WITH MORE THAN 250 SEATS IS ALLOWED WITHIN A RURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE, BUT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST.

AND THAT'S WHY YOU ARE SEEING THIS REQUEST TONIGHT.

SO, A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE VICINITY.

AGAIN, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ADDRESSED AT 2150 EAST LINDA VISTA DRIVE.

SURROUNDING THAT SUBJECT PROPERTY IS MOSTLY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

ZONED TO THE NORTH THERE'S SKYLINE ESTATES TO THE SOUTH, GREENLAW ESTATES SEVEN SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST, LINDA VISTA PARK ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND TO THE WEST, ANOTHER CHURCH, PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH OF FLAGSTAFF.

OKAY, SO LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN IN FRONT OF YOU, YOU CAN SEE BY INDICATED BY THAT RED ARROW.

THAT'S WHERE THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION IS GOING TO GO.

THERE'S THE EXISTING BUILDING HERE ON SITE.

AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION IS ABOUT 6600FT², GROSS SQUARE FEET.

I WILL NOTE THAT ON SITE, THIS PARKING AREA IS ALREADY EXISTING AND ON SITE.

IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THE SITE, PLAN THIS PARKING AREA TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE THAT'S PROPOSED AND IS TRIGGERED BY THAT BUILDING ADDITION.

SO THAT'S THERE TO SATISFY THAT REQUIREMENT.

AND THERE'S A ADA WALKWAY THAT LEADS DOWN TO EAST LINDA VISTA DRIVE FROM THAT COURTYARD BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.

OKAY. AND THEN LOOKING AT THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN, THIS IS THE FLOOR PLAN OF THE BUILDING ADDITIONS.

SO THIS IS THE FIRST FLOOR.

HERE'S THE SECOND FLOOR.

AND THEN THIS BUILDING RIGHT HERE IS WHAT'S EXISTING ON SITE.

SO AS MENTIONED WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONS THERE IS A MAIN THERE'S A SANCTUARY PROPOSED.

AND IT'S 4200 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF SANCTUARY SPACE.

AND IT'S GOING TO SEAT ABOUT ROUGHLY 362 SEATS.

AGAIN, THAT TRIGGERS THAT CUP REQUEST AT THAT THRESHOLD OF 250 SEATS.

SO THAT'S WHY YOU'RE SEEING THE CUP REQUEST TONIGHT.

WITHIN THE BUILDING ADDITION, THERE'S ALSO MEETING ROOMS, OFFICE ROOMS AND A LIBRARY.

THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILDING ON SITE, AS MENTIONED.

THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO HAVE THAT EXISTING SANCTUARY SPACE AS THE AUXILIARY SANCTUARY TO SERVE FOR CHILDREN'S CHURCH PURPOSES.

OKAY. AND SO, FOR STAFF TO IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CUP, THREE FINDINGS NEED TO BE MET AND THE FIRST OF WHICH IS LISTED ON THE SCREEN HERE. SO, THE CONDITIONAL USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF THE ZONING CODE AND THE PURPOSE OF THE SPECIFIC ZONE.

SO AS MENTIONED, THE SUBJECT SITE IS ZONED RURAL RESIDENTIAL.

A PLACE OF WORSHIP WITH MORE THAN 250 SEATS IS ALLOWED WITH A CUP, AND THE APPLICANT IS TAKING THAT STEP TO PURSUE THAT CUP.

SO BY DOING SO, THEY'RE MEETING THIS FINDING.

THE SECOND FINDING IS THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE, AND WITH THAT, THIS APPLICATION NEEDS TO BE OPERATING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT THAT THERE WILL BE NO ANTICIPATED NOISE, SMOKE, ODOR, DUST, VIBRATION OR ILLUMINATION, AS WELL AS NO KNOWN HAZARD OF EXPLOSION, CONTAMINATION, FIRE OR FLOOD, AS WELL AS NO UNUSUAL VOLUME OF CHARACTER OF TRAFFIC.

SO, NONE OF THIS IS BEING TRIGGERED.

THIS FINDING IS BEING MET.

SO, THE THIRD AND LAST AND ALSO REALLY LENGTHY ONE IS THE CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE REASONABLY COMPATIBLE WITH USES PERMITTED IN SURROUNDING AREA PER THE FOLLOWING.

AND THEN IT LISTS OUT VERY SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS, WHICH I WILL GO INTO DETAIL IN THE NEXT FEW SLIDES.

SO, THE FIRST OF WHICH IS ACCESS, TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION.

ACCESS TO THE SITE IS ALREADY PROVIDED FROM EAST LINDA VISTA DRIVE.

A TIA OR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IS NOT REQUIRED WITH THIS APPLICATION.

BY CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS ALONG EAST LINDA VISTA DRIVE IN FRONT OF THE SITE AND ONTO THE SITE, AND ADA SIDEWALK IS PROPOSED WITH THIS NEW SITE PLAN CONNECTING THE SOUTH COURTYARD BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS TO THE SIDEWALK ON EAST LINDA VISTA DRIVE.

AND AS MENTIONED, THIS NEW BUILDING ADDITION TRIGGERS PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND THAT SECTION OF PARKING CODE THAT APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT IS LISTED HERE ON THE SCREEN ABOVE.

AND THAT REQUIREMENT IS 70 PARKING SPACES.

THIS SITE PLAN IS MEETING THAT WITH ADA.

[00:10:04]

IT'S NOT ANTICIPATED.

THE SITE IS CURRENTLY WELL MAINTAINED.

AND FOR STYLE AND SITING OF STRUCTURE AND RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO, APPLICATIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ARE EXPECTED TO CONFORM TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARD PORTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE.

AND THIS PROJECT WHEN IT WAS GOING THROUGH REVIEW AT IDS.

AND SO THAT INCLUDES CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW AS WELL AS SITE PLAN REVIEW.

STAFF WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION IS MEETING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS.

SO THAT INCLUDED THINGS LIKE BUILDING MATERIAL, BUILDING COLOR AND MAKING SURE THAT THE RESULTING BUILDING ADDITION IS COMPLEMENTARY TO WHAT'S ALREADY EXISTING ON SITE. SO THAT'S BEING MET WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.

LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING.

LANDSCAPING STANDARDS DO APPLY TO THIS APPLICATION AS A CUP.

I WILL NOTE THAT THIS APPLICATION HAS AN ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING SCHEME THAT IS ALLOWED BY CODE.

SO WHAT IS TYPICALLY ASKED FOR WITHIN THE LANDSCAPING SECTION OF THE CODE IS NOT NECESSARILY APPLIED TO THIS PROJECT, BUT CODE DOES ALLOW FOR THAT PROVISION OF AN ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING CODE OR A LANDSCAPING SCHEME WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR, WHICH SHE GRANTED.

SO FOR IMPACT ON PUBLIC UTILITIES, IT'S ALREADY CONNECTED TO THE SITE, IS ALREADY CONNECTED TO EXISTING CITY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES, SO NO NEW OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED AND ANY NEW SIGNAGE AND OUTDOOR LIGHTING WHEN IT COMES TO BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE REGULATIONS FOR BOTH AS WELL AS THE APPLICABLE PERMITS FOR BOTH.

NO NEW DEDICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS OF STREETS AND NO CULTURAL RESOURCES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON SITE.

THE LAST TWO EXTRA FINDINGS WITH HERITAGE PRESERVATION AND TRANSIT DON'T APPLY TO THIS APPLICATION.

SO, FOR THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN, THIS IS A STATE REQUIREMENT.

THE APPLICANT NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300FT OF THE SUBJECT SITE OF THIS APPLICATION, AS WELL AS THEY POSTED THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THE APPLICANT ALSO HAD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ON SITE ON APRIL 25TH, WHICH WAS A THURSDAY, AND THERE WERE NINE NEIGHBORHOOD ATTENDEES WITH NO SUBSTANTIAL CONCERNS THAT CAME OUT OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.

THERE IS A SECOND NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THAT'S REQUIRED BY CODE, BUT THAT CAN BE WAIVED.

AND BECAUSE THAT FIRST NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING HAD NO SUBSTANTIAL CONCERNS THAT CAME UP, THAT WAS ALSO WAIVED BY THE DIRECTOR AND TO DATE, STAFF.

AND ALSO THE APPLICANT HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS OF THE DATE OF THIS PRESENTATION.

NOW WITH THAT, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINDINGS, STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PZ-24-00046 WITH THE FOLLOWING ONE CONDITION.

AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION.

OKAY, SO I DO HAVE A QUESTION BEFORE I GO TO OTHER QUESTIONS.

AND ONE OF THE QUESTIONS IS JUST ABOUT THE RECOMMENDATIONS.

SO, THIS DOES NOT NEED TO GO TO COUNCIL.

IS THAT CORRECT. SO WE CAN RECOMMEND APPROVAL BUT NOT IT'S NOT APPROVAL TO GO TO COUNCIL.

IS THAT RIGHT. OKAY.

JUST DOUBLE CHECKING ON THAT.

AND THEN I JUST HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.

I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE HAS QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF BEFORE I..

DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? CAN YOU GO INTO THE ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING SCHEME? YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

I'M JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHY IT WAS APPROVED AS AN ALTERNATIVE AND WHY, YOU KNOW, THE EXISTING RECOMMENDATION DIDN'T FIT THEIR SITE.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

SO THIS IS ALREADY AN EXISTING DEVELOPED SITE, AND THIS IS A BUILDING ADDITION TO WHAT'S ALREADY EXISTING ON SITE.

SO, THE APPLICANT'S ALREADY WORKING WITH WHAT IS ALREADY PRESENT ON SITE.

SO, THERE WERE CERTAIN CONSTRAINTS INTO WHERE THEY CAN IMPLEMENT THAT LANDSCAPING.

THE OTHER THING TOO, AND THIS IS ALSO SPECIFIED BY CODE WITHIN THEIR ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING SCHEME PORTION, IS THAT IF THE SITE HAS QUITE A BIT OF SUBSTANTIAL TOPOGRAPHY THAT THEY CAN HAVE, THAT THEY CAN REQUEST FOR AN ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING SCHEME.

AND IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS SITE HERE, THE TOPO LINES, AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF TOPOGRAPHY.

IF WE'RE LOOKING OFF OF EAST LINDA VISTA DRIVE, THE SITE SLOPES UP.

SO THERE IS A LITTLE BIT OF CONSTRAINTS WITH THAT.

YEAH. AND YOU REALLY CAN'T SEE IT FROM THE STREET, SO YOU HAVE TO BE IN THE PARKING LOT TO SEE THE, TO SEE THE TOPOGRAPHY AND TO SEE WHAT'S THERE,

[00:15:03]

SO, MIKE, DO YOU HAVE A STAFF QUESTION? SO, I DID DRIVE THE SITE TODAY.

I ACTUALLY WENT INTO THE PARKING LOT.

SO I'M GLAD YOU ASKED THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING.

THAT WAS ONE OF MY QUESTIONS AS WELL.

AND REGARDING THAT SLOPE, THE WAY THAT IT'S SLOPED OR GENTLY TERRACED, ARE THEY LEVELING THAT? AND SO THAT FENCE IS GOING TO BE WAY UP HIGH.

HOW ARE THEY TREATING THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE? YEAH. SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS THEY'RE NOT REGRADING THE TOPOGRAPHY.

THE ONLY NEW IMPROVEMENTS THAT'S HAPPENING ON SITE IS THIS ADA SIDEWALK THAT LEADS DOWN TO THE SIDEWALK ALONG EAST LINDA VISTA.

SO, YOU'LL DRIVE UP A BIT OF A SLOPE TO THOSE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES UP ALONG THE NORTH END.

WHERE YOU'RE SEEING. SO YES.

AND DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STAGE THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS REVIEWED BY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING.

YEAH. OKAY.

AND THEN THE PARKING.

SO BASICALLY, IT'S DOUBLING IN SIZE AND THEREFORE THE PARKING IS NOW DOUBLING IN SIZE.

ARE THERE ANY ISSUES WITH THE CURRENT SETUP AS WELL AS THIS PROPOSED SETUP.

WHERE WOULD OVERFLOW PARKING GO? HAS THERE EVER BEEN A PROBLEM WITH OVERFLOW PARKING BEING THAT IT IS A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY? YEAH, I'M NATHANIEL BRADFORD.

I'M THE LEAD PASTOR AT MOUNTAIN VIEW.

AND SO, YEAH, WITH OVERFLOW, THAT'S BEEN A PROBLEM THAT WE'VE HAD FOR YEARS.

AND SO, WE PARTNERED WITH PUENTE DE HOZHO TO HAVE OVERFLOW.

DURING THOSE BIG EVENTS THAT YOU TALKED ABOUT, SUCH AS LIGHT NIGHT.

WE HAVE OUR ARIZONA RANGERS THAT COME AND HELP WITH CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL.

SO THEY'RE THERE EVERY YEAR TO HELP US IN THAT AREA.

AND WE DO HAVE GREAT NEIGHBORS THAT ALLOW SOME PARKING IN FRONT OF THEIR HOMES AND ALL THAT.

THEY'VE BEEN DOING THAT FOR YEARS.

SO THAT'S NEVER BEEN AN ISSUE AS FAR AS OVERFLOW ON THOSE EVENTS, HOWEVER, EVERY SUNDAY WE'VE SORT OF CREATED A SPACE UP TOP WHERE THERE'S REALLY NO PAVING.

BUT WE NEED TO GET PEOPLE PARKED UP TOP BECAUSE WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF PARKING EVERY SUNDAY NOW.

SO, BUT AGAIN, WITH OVERFLOW, WE PARTNER WITH PUENTE DE HOZHO.

AND DURING THOSE BIG EVENTS, ARIZONA RANGERS HELP US OUT TREMENDOUSLY WITH CROWD AND PARKING.

YOU KNOW, I LIVE NEARBY AND I.

MY KIDS ARE GROWN. SO YEAH, THEY DON'T GET TO GO TO THOSE EVENTS ANYMORE.

YEAH, I LOVE THOSE EVENTS.

I JUST, YOU KNOW, I'VE KNOWN HALLOWEEN ESPECIALLY RIGHT.

AS YOU HAVE A BIG FAIR.

YEAH. THE TRAFFIC HITS, RIGHT? YEAH. AND THAT'S THE REASON WHY THOSE RANGERS, THEY COME OUT AND THEY REALLY, REALLY HELP WITH THAT.

SO IT'S VERY WELL, YOU KNOW, MAINTAINED AND CONTROLLED.

AND SO YEAH, WE'VE NOT HAD ANY ISSUES OVER THE YEARS THAT WE'VE BEEN DOING THAT AS FAR AS PARKING AND ALL THAT BECAUSE FOLK ARE WANTING TO COME THERE.

SO THEY ARE USED TO THE OVERFLOW AT THE SCHOOL.

AND OF COURSE, IN CERTAIN AREAS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE OUR GREAT NEIGHBORS YOU KNOW, HELP US OUT IN THAT.

[00:20:14]

OH, YEAH.

YEAH. THERE ARE SEVERAL OF THEM THAT SHOW UP.

SOME OF THEM ARE JUST ASSIGNED FOR TRAFFIC AND CROWD MAKING SURE KIDDOS AREN'T RUNNING ACROSS THE STREET.

AND SOME JUST MINGLE WITHIN THE, YOU KNOW, CROWD BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE.

SO JUST THEIR PRESENCE IN UNIFORM REALLY HELPS WITH THAT AS WELL.

MIC] YEAH.

AND I CAN TURN TO THE PAGE.

SO, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, IS YOUR QUESTION MORE ABOUT HOW THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS ARE BEING APPLIED TO THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT AND IF THEY ARE MEETING THOSE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS? OKAY. SO WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO BUILDING MATERIAL, THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE REQUIRES AT LEAST 75% OF THE BUILDING MATERIAL AS PRIMARY MATERIAL TO LOOK NATURAL IN THE SENSE WHERE THEY LOOK LIKE MASONRY OR ROCK OR WOOD.

IN THIS CASE, STUCCO IS CONSIDERED A SECONDARY MATERIAL, SO ANYTHING 25% OR LESS CAN BE CONSIDERED A SECONDARY MATERIAL FOR THIS PROJECT.

THEY ARE MEETING THAT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS IN TERMS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF THAT PERCENTAGE.

SO, THAT'S ANOTHER REQUIREMENT TOO, IS THE LIGHT REFLECTANCE VALUE NEEDS TO BE 50 OR LESS.

AND I BELIEVE THIS APPLICATION IS MEETING THAT REQUIREMENT.

SO, WELL, NOW IT'S WORKING.

TEST? YEAH.

TEST. A B, C D E F G.

IT'S WORKING NOW.

TEST. TEST.

MINES WORKING.

MIC] TEST.

MIC] HELLO. IT SEEMS TO BE WORKING.

IT'S ON.

SO. BUT LET'S SEE NOW THOSE TWO ARE ON AND I CAN TALK.

[00:25:01]

OKAY.

SO, DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS? YEAH. SO THE ONLY THING I'LL DO, I'LL SHARE THAT I AM A MEMBER AT MOUNTAIN VIEW, AND THEN MY COMPANY DID HAVE A ROLE IN SOME OF THE CIVIL DESIGN.

I SPOKE TO ALEX ABOUT IT, AND WE DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BUT I WANTED TO DISCLOSE THAT WITH THIS GROUP.

HEARING, NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.

DOES SOMEBODY WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? BUT CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE LAST SLIDE SO THEY CAN MAKE A MOTION FROM THAT LAST SLIDE FROM THE RECOMMENDATION? THANK YOU. MARY.

YEAH, I'LL GO AHEAD.

I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR MOUNTAIN VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH.

PZ 240000046.

WITH THE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE SHALL SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORM TO THE PLANS AS PRESENTED WITH THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION.

IS THERE A SECOND TO THE MOTION? CAN WE ALSO DO IT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINDINGS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINDINGS? THANK YOU. ALEX. IS THERE A SECOND TO THE MOTION? SECOND. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES.

SO WE CAN MOVE ON.

CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU ALL.

AND WE CAN MOVE ON TO MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO AND FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS.

IS THERE ANY? HEARING NONE.

WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 4:31.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU TO THE STAFF AND THANK YOU TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH FOR COMING.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.